He is essentially giving the chartalist theory of money. Money cannot arise except through the fiat of the state. Chartalists hate the Mengerian theory on the origin of money because it posits that money arises as a market phenomena. Eventually the state co-opted money, but that does not mean money arose because of the state. The emergence of bitcoin is a thorn in the side to chartalists. We can't really go back and…
A Prediction: Bitcoin Is Doomed to Fail
341–350 of 431 posts
Re: A Prediction: Bitcoin Is Doomed to Fail
#342Bitcoin may have already failed as a currency. However I think it has spectacularly succeeded as a store of value - an alternative to gold, if you will. It has all the benefits of gold, none of its problems (bulk), and some brilliant advantages: ease of handling/transportation/transferring (maybe transferring it is too easy - make an unlucky typo and your savings are most probably lost for good - but that's a side ef…
Re: A Prediction: Bitcoin Is Doomed to Fail
#343Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not saying that Friedman is right but this is a thorny issue in economics: Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon. —Milton Friedman, 1963
Sure, it's a monetary phenomenon, but that doesn't mean it always comes from monetary policy. In fact, the big reason monetary policy exists is to control inflation. Without monetary policy, inflation and deflation depend solely on the production of the economy compared to the relatively fixed supply of money. Which is what will happen if bitcoin takes off. Growing economy + fixed money supply = deflation. So the GP…
What is correct view? I don't know, the only thing I remember about the monetary economics class I took, is that the professor and I didn't agree. About what I don't know. I do know that these are interesting times for him and colleagues. When/if Bitcoin stabilizes they can study the effect of monetary policy, the PPP, etc. I almost want to become one.
Re: A Prediction: Bitcoin Is Doomed to Fail
#344Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's not true, there could be multiple buyers and the punchline would just be, "to whom? there's only the three of you."
That punchline would make no sense. The client would reply "to the market of two buyers".
Re: A Prediction: Bitcoin Is Doomed to Fail
#345Earlier quoted context omitted.
Payment processors such as bitpay offer same-day bitcoin-to-fiat conversion and bank deposit with extremely low fees (0.1% - 1%), and are becoming the defacto standard. This is expected during the bootstrapping phase. Later, if bitcoin firmly establishes itself, merchants could choose to not convert directly to fiat.
Merchants would still need to convert to legal tender for payroll, rent, and taxes. Their income and expenses would still be more efficiently denominated in dollars (or the local equivalent). What is the expected draw for businesses to keep their operating funds in BTC as opposed to USD?
Re: A Prediction: Bitcoin Is Doomed to Fail
#346Earlier quoted context omitted.
Woo, bacon lollipops, server hosting, and pizza. Truly the essentials. You need grocery stores, gas stations, clothing stores, and restaurants to start accepting it. Until then, it's really just a novelty for middle class college Libertarians.
I love saying this: Do you think that cryptocurrencies spring fully-formed from the forehead of Zeus?
Re: A Prediction: Bitcoin Is Doomed to Fail
#347My prediction is that Bitcoin (or some other alt-coin/cryptocurrency) will eventually become a single worldwide currency. It's reached a point where if a government tries to regulate it too tightly, they will effectively be shooting themselves in the foot and cutting their country off from outside trade. The result is that the cryptocurrency will continue to gain momentum until it is used everywhere worldwide. This w…
Re: A Prediction: Bitcoin Is Doomed to Fail
#348Bitcoin may have already failed as a currency. However I think it has spectacularly succeeded as a store of value - an alternative to gold, if you will. It has all the benefits of gold, none of its problems (bulk), and some brilliant advantages: ease of handling/transportation/transferring (maybe transferring it is too easy - make an unlucky typo and your savings are most probably lost for good - but that's a side ef…
Well gold has this one minor benefit test it is intrinsically valuable ... That and you don't have to. A nerd to understand how to use it.
You can't explain the high price of gold merely by its intrinsic value. OK, it's shiny, but there are other sniny metals. It can be used in electronics, or as filling/crown material - but it was valuable before people started using it for that. So much for the intrinsic value.
So it must be something else that makes gold as valuable as it has always been. It's rare, fungible, divisible, portable - an ideal medium for storing value.
Well, bitcoin is all those things and more.
Re: A Prediction: Bitcoin Is Doomed to Fail
#349Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sure, it's a monetary phenomenon, but that doesn't mean it always comes from monetary policy. In fact, the big reason monetary policy exists is to control inflation. Without monetary policy, inflation and deflation depend solely on the production of the economy compared to the relatively fixed supply of money. Which is what will happen if bitcoin takes off. Growing economy + fixed money supply = deflation. So the GP…
However, with Bitcoin the percentage claim on the total economy is constant. So, in a sense, the real price of all consumer goods also remains constant. In this view there is no inflation or deflation and inflation indeed is a purely monetary phenomenon. What is correct view? I don't know, the only thing I remember about the monetary economics class I took, is that the professor and I didn't agree. About what I don't…
No, you're ignoring GDP growth. As the bitcoin economy grows (more goods and services available), the share of the pie 1 bitcoin represents correspondingly grows. This results in decreasing prices, i.e. price deflation.
Re: A Prediction: Bitcoin Is Doomed to Fail
#350Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think he's making a liquidity point. It may be easy from a process standpoint to cash out, but the question is how much the value of your bitcoins may change whenever you cash out. http://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/liquidity.asp Part of the value of dollars as a medium of exchange is that the value does not fluctuate greatly from day to day or minute to minute. In the short term, you can rely on prices remaining…
jnbiche, it's not letting me reply to you so I'm doing it here. You make a good point, and my above explanation was a bit confused. I think BTC faces both problems: There's high volatility, driven by the current level of speculation and the fixed quantity of Bitcoins that exist on the market. This makes Bitcoin a fairly poor medium of exchange since it is unlikely to hold a stable value from one day to the next. Ther…
Unless you're an investment banker, yes. There are multiple exchanges that handle daily volume in the 10's of millions USD, with order books deep enough that you could cash out millions of dollars worth of bitcoin without moving the price more than a few percent.
That's nothing compared to what Wall St or the city is used to, but it is plenty enough liquidity for all but the most well off individuals, and growing. When the Winklevoss twins get their bitcoin ETF to IPO, I expect these numbers to increase by orders of magnitude.
Also, none of that is counting the significant volume of transactions which occur non-public or off-exchange.