Live data from Hacker News

Fix Ubuntu

fixubuntu.com

241–250 of 304 posts

Re: Fix Ubuntu

#241
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

is it possible to pay them and get an "ad free" version?

Since it is basically possible to get an "ad free" version by disabling that feature, and it is possible to donate to them. Yes?

That isn't the same thing as you clearly know... Paying to have things privacy infringing settings disabled and donating and then having to disable said privacy infringing settings are very different things.

Re: Fix Ubuntu

#242

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I love Debian. But I wish they had a stable version released more often.

You could try getting on the testing release which (as far as I can tell) is still ten times as stable as Ubuntu while still getting frequent updates. Testing is the best of both worlds IMO (stability freshness)

My only problem is compiling nvidia drivers on the testing default kernel right now. At least there was a bug keeping it from compiling with dkms.

Re: Fix Ubuntu

#244
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Steam works fine on both Xubuntu and Mint. Haven't tried it on Debian yet

I use Steam on Debian stable and it works absolutely fine, I've never had an issue with it. The games run great too.

How did you install it? Also what games work great? For instance team fortress 2 had some weird shader problems on stable for me.

Re: Fix Ubuntu

#245
post #34

This whining about Ubuntu is ridiculous. Removing the shopping features is easy enough anyway, without devoting a site to it, never mind posting it to HN. Furthermore, there's plenty of choices out there. The best of which (IMO) are openSUSE, Fedora, and Arch/Manjaro. Mint is terrible - like a buggier version of Ubuntu or unstable Debian... Furthermore, Canonical puts alot of work into Ubuntu. They deserve to get pai…

For a typical user figuring out the command that this site provides to ensure their privacy is most certainly not "easy enough".

Luckily enough for them, turning off the Amazon search lens can be done through a GUI, and not just shell commands...

Re: Fix Ubuntu

#246
post #184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

" Traffic generated by users being misled into going there is not legitimate in terms of the trademark." FixUbuntu is a very very very very clear case of nominative fair use. I can't think of a less close case in recent memory. They are using the trademark as it should be used - to describe the product they are talking about. The fact that Ubuntu may not like what they are saying makes no difference. The disclaimer m…

No, it's passing off, which is a violation of trademark law. Using the name Ubuntu to describe and criticize the product Ubuntu is fine. Appearing to be an official website to lure visitors in is not. That's passing off. If walk into a branded store only to find a notice that it isn't actually that brand, it's still passing off. > The disclaimer makes clear it's not associated... This was only added in response to th…

I'm going to go with the opinion of the open source lawyer ('DannyBee) on this one, in favor of the random message board commenter who appears to be quoting Wikipedia.

Re: Fix Ubuntu

#247
post #102

Solution: stop using Ubuntu. There are lots of other very able distributions out there, many of which not only have better privacy features but also are technologically superior in one way or another. In no particular order, these are all very capable operating systems for a variety of needs: * https://fedoraproject.org/ * http://www.centos.org/ * http://www.opensuse.org/ * http://www.mageia.org/ * https://www.archli…

Problem is that none of those distributions, except for the bloated mess that is Linux Mint, has adequate support for PPA's. Hence, I'm sticking with Lubuntu.

Re: Fix Ubuntu

#248
post #127
post #28

Ubuntu provides by default an on/off slider in its privacy settings for disabling the display of online search results in the dash[1], BUT I'm not sure if changing that slider to 'off' will also disable the sharing of searches with Canonical's servers. (The language used by the settings app is ambiguous: "When searching on the dash, include online search results - ON/OFF.") Moreover, I don't particularly feel like sp…

Why not just use a non-Unity desktop? At this point all 3 major spins of Ubuntu are highly stable and functional.

The other versions within the Ubuntu family also connect to Canonical servers.

I see connections to "...golem.canonical.com" in Etherape when using Lubuntu 13.10.

Re: Fix Ubuntu

#249
post #102

Solution: stop using Ubuntu. There are lots of other very able distributions out there, many of which not only have better privacy features but also are technologically superior in one way or another. In no particular order, these are all very capable operating systems for a variety of needs: * https://fedoraproject.org/ * http://www.centos.org/ * http://www.opensuse.org/ * http://www.mageia.org/ * https://www.archli…

Problem is that none of those distributions, except for the bloated mess that is Linux Mint, has adequate support for PPA's. Hence, I'm sticking with Lubuntu.

Most of those distributions have mechanisms comparable to PPAs for similar functionality.

Re: Fix Ubuntu

#250
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm pretty openly not a Linux desktop user, but come on: if Windows hasn't rearranged core functionality in the XP to Vista/7 transition, and again in the 7 to 8 transition, and again (less so, but noticeably) in the 8 to 8.1 transition, then I don't know what your standard is. (Apple's been better about it following the initial iOS-esque feature landings, but that, too, was disruptive.) Conversely, Ubuntu's operated…

I really haven't noticed a big difference between XP to 7. The control panel things moved around a bit, but the settings were all still in the Control Panel (and you could get the classic view back easily), and I had to figure out how to right-click on things "run as Admin". My son just hopped from XP to 7 and he's been having zero issues. I admit I haven't gone to Windows 8. I owe myself a new laptop and I just have…

As someone who recently had little choice but to start using 7, I can say that the differences between XP and 7 are vast, many, and annoying. Some can be fixed with Classic Shell, some by a few choice changes to settings and appearance, but some are just features that were removed.
Post reply on HN