I fixed it by switching to Mint. I'm liking it so far.
Fix Ubuntu
11–20 of 304 posts
Re: Fix Ubuntu
#12I fixed it by switching to Mint. I'm liking it so far.
Then I go back to Linux for something and everything I used to know is now completely useless.
Re: Fix Ubuntu
#13http://www.debian.org There, fixed.
Re: Fix Ubuntu
#14I fixed it by switching to Mint. I'm liking it so far.
It's so depressing that I need to keep on devoting mental energy to Linux environments. When I use Windows or OSX I don't have to keep on guessing on what-the-what is going on. Then I go back to Linux for something and everything I used to know is now completely useless.
Re: Fix Ubuntu
#15I fixed it by switching to Mint. I'm liking it so far.
Re: Fix Ubuntu
#16Re: Fix Ubuntu
#17I fixed it by switching to Mint. I'm liking it so far.
It's so depressing that I need to keep on devoting mental energy to Linux environments. When I use Windows or OSX I don't have to keep on guessing on what-the-what is going on. Then I go back to Linux for something and everything I used to know is now completely useless.
I had to expend a lot more mental energy last time I tried to use modern Windows, and has OS X got a maximise button yet?
--edit-- I'm not trying to say "My OS is better than your OS" because we all know where that leads. I just don't think anything is perfect and it likely comes down to what you're used to.
Re: Fix Ubuntu
#18Re: Fix Ubuntu
#19Re: Fix Ubuntu
#20"In case you are either 1) a complete idiot; or 2) a lawyer; or 3) both, please be aware that this site is not affiliated with or approved by Canonical Limited." "This site criticizes Canonical for certain privacy-invading features of Ubuntu and teaches users how to fix them. So, obviously, the site is not approved by Canonical." "And our use of the trademarked term Ubuntu is plainly descriptive—it helps the public f…
I disagree. askubuntu.com already exists and is officially sanctioned. From domain name alone, I think it's reasonable to assume that users will believe that fixubuntu.com is also officially sanctioned. Traffic generated by users being misled into going there is not legitimate in terms of the trademark.
OTOH, ubuntusucks.com is obviously critical commentary. I don't think that would (or should) be a trademark violation.