One thing I find interesting is that it's somehow okay as long as it's directed at 'the foreigners'. Who are these foreigners? Is it Sergey Brin or Larry Page, before they moved to the US? Elon Musk? Peter Thiel? Many Americans need not look further than their grandparents to see a 'foreigner' (and, excluding a few natives, the entire nation has been built by foreigners). Would it not makes sense to show the same cou…
It’s time for Silicon Valley to ask: Is it worth it?
11–20 of 329 posts
Re: It’s time for Silicon Valley to ask: Is it worth it?
#12Re: It’s time for Silicon Valley to ask: Is it worth it?
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not okay ; it's still morally questionable at best . But it is infinitely more legal. The government has all sorts of restrictions on what it can do (e.g., the 4th amendment), that apply to citizens, but not foreign nationals. If they are not even bothering to respect the distinction, it's the case that they violate both the spirit and the letter of the law without a care; it's a much more dangerous position of…
The government has all sorts of restrictions on what it can do (e.g., the 4th amendment), that apply to citizens, but not foreign nationals. Are you sure about that? IANAL, and I've not kept up with more recent laws, but the forth doesn't say anything about "citizens", it says "people".
Re: It’s time for Silicon Valley to ask: Is it worth it?
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not okay ; it's still morally questionable at best . But it is infinitely more legal. The government has all sorts of restrictions on what it can do (e.g., the 4th amendment), that apply to citizens, but not foreign nationals. If they are not even bothering to respect the distinction, it's the case that they violate both the spirit and the letter of the law without a care; it's a much more dangerous position of…
The government has all sorts of restrictions on what it can do (e.g., the 4th amendment), that apply to citizens, but not foreign nationals. Are you sure about that? IANAL, and I've not kept up with more recent laws, but the forth doesn't say anything about "citizens", it says "people".
Re: It’s time for Silicon Valley to ask: Is it worth it?
#15Re: It’s time for Silicon Valley to ask: Is it worth it?
#16Re: It’s time for Silicon Valley to ask: Is it worth it?
#17This can only stop IF the companies proactively make an attempt to get out of bed from the organizations which hold a gun over their head. Currently, the companies want to "spy" (for marketing, advertisements etc.) on their customers as much as governments.
Re: It’s time for Silicon Valley to ask: Is it worth it?
#18>American tech companies, in other words, are now the Huaweis of everywhere else. This can only stop IF the companies proactively make an attempt to get out of bed from the organizations which hold a gun over their head. Currently, the companies want to "spy" (for marketing, advertisements etc.) on their customers as much as governments.
Re: It’s time for Silicon Valley to ask: Is it worth it?
#19I'm not trying to be intentionally obtuse, I just legitimately am curious
Re: It’s time for Silicon Valley to ask: Is it worth it?
#20"Now, Silicon Valley needs to join them." - because we otherwise approve of the snooping, but for this latest outrage? I'm honestly wondering - what's the other side of this? Who's defending and explaining this? I have not seen an article that "takes the other side" in some time, and that might be a result of the echo chamber that is the bay area... Or it might be the result of an "intelligence community" that really…