Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think the biggest barrier to entry of any new and secure email protocol will be GMail. GMail (and similar services) are what most people seem to use at this point. And GMail won't update to 3.0 in any meaningful way, no matter what, since they want to be able to mine the data in your email, so they will still be storing it on their servers "in the clear." Which means the next time NSA hacks their servers, they'll s…
I think that the greatest barrier will be Exchange and other corporate email servers software. Without corporate buy-in, this will never take off. Corps "need" to have an overview of the messages unsecured. There is no such thing as personal privacy in the corporate world, only corporate privacy.
Announcing The Dark Mail Alliance – Founded by Silent Circle and Lavabit
201–210 of 217 posts
Re: Announcing The Dark Mail Alliance – Founded by Silent Circle and Lavabit
#202Re: Announcing The Dark Mail Alliance – Founded by Silent Circle and Lavabit
#203Earlier quoted context omitted.
I totally agree, I really think you should change the name. Some suggestions: - Locke Mail [from John Locke] - Mill Mail [from John Stuart Mill] - Hobbes Mail - Liberty Mail
Prtty much nobody would understand the connotations of Locke, Mill or Hobbes, and amongst those who do they'd be contentious. Consider that for example Mill thought despotism could be acceptable under utilitarian principles if the end result was a better society afterwards; I don't know what you think of Marx [Marx Mail? Maybe not], but even an authoritarian reading of Marx ideological works fits within utilitarian p…
Re: Announcing The Dark Mail Alliance – Founded by Silent Circle and Lavabit
#204I hope to see this magic new mystery protocol as something similar to TextSecure, where we have forward secrecy from the OTR protocol. The current e-mail protocols are far too centralized, which doesn't make sense. Mail is delivered, and after that, it is no longer in possession of USPS. This is unlike how E-mail works (even though it kind of seems like that's what happens). I hope to see some kind of client being re…
The protocol is based on SCIMP[0] which supports forward secrecy. [0]: https://silentcircle.com/web/scimp-protocol/
Re: Announcing The Dark Mail Alliance – Founded by Silent Circle and Lavabit
#205I appreciate the cheekiness of calling it the "Dark Mail Alliance", but from a purely PR perspective, it would make sense to reconsider your name if you are taking the position that encrypted end-to-end email is not solely an interest of those pursuing shady or deviant activities.
Re: Announcing The Dark Mail Alliance – Founded by Silent Circle and Lavabit
#206Earlier quoted context omitted.
I totally agree, I really think you should change the name. Some suggestions: - Locke Mail [from John Locke] - Mill Mail [from John Stuart Mill] - Hobbes Mail - Liberty Mail
Freedom \ Liberty \ Patriot \ Constitution Mail would be very effective in blocking political speeches and biased headlines from cheap attacks. My personal favorite is Lincoln Mail... Seems highly appropriate on many levels and should be FOX News proof.
Re: Announcing The Dark Mail Alliance – Founded by Silent Circle and Lavabit
#207"Dark Mail" reminds me of Chrono Trigger...
Re: Announcing The Dark Mail Alliance – Founded by Silent Circle and Lavabit
#208Earlier quoted context omitted.
I suggest names that don't have limited country/cultural references if the intent is to make this a global success. Some other suggestions: -SecMail (Secure Email) -PrivMail (private/privacy email) -FMail (freedom email) -NetMail (New Internet standard email) And thank you for taking this on, it is seriously needed. And please, no reliance on CA certs, chances are the NSA has compromised at least some of those.
I like Fmail because it is the alphabetical successor to Email.
Re: Announcing The Dark Mail Alliance – Founded by Silent Circle and Lavabit
#209I appreciate the cheekiness of calling it the "Dark Mail Alliance", but from a purely PR perspective, it would make sense to reconsider your name if you are taking the position that encrypted end-to-end email is not solely an interest of those pursuing shady or deviant activities.
I think the "Dark" in "Dark Mail Alliance" is meant more in the sense that it's "off the grid" of NSA spying capabilities, not that it's meant to be used for nefarious purposes.
Re: Announcing The Dark Mail Alliance – Founded by Silent Circle and Lavabit
#210I appreciate the cheekiness of calling it the "Dark Mail Alliance", but from a purely PR perspective, it would make sense to reconsider your name if you are taking the position that encrypted end-to-end email is not solely an interest of those pursuing shady or deviant activities.
I totally agree, I really think you should change the name. Some suggestions: - Locke Mail [from John Locke] - Mill Mail [from John Stuart Mill] - Hobbes Mail - Liberty Mail