Live data from Hacker News

Jonathan Ive designs Leica camera for Red charity

bbc.co.uk

1–10 of 43 posts

Re: Jonathan Ive designs Leica camera for Red charity

#3
> The camera took 85 days and more than 735 hours to manufacture. During that time more than 550 models and 1,000 prototype parts were made and tested; 55 engineers worked on the process.

And

> It is expected to fetch between $500,000 (£312,000) and $750,000.

If they took the cost of that time and work and donated it directly to the charity how much would it have been?

Re: Jonathan Ive designs Leica camera for Red charity

#4
> 85 days and more than 735 hours

> more than 550 models and 1,000 prototype parts were made and tested... 55 engineers worked on the process.

Uhh... I think they spent more developing this than what it will fetch. Wouldn't it have been better to just donate the money?

A 500k donation at the expense of that many resources...

Re: Jonathan Ive designs Leica camera for Red charity

#7
post #3

> The camera took 85 days and more than 735 hours to manufacture. During that time more than 550 models and 1,000 prototype parts were made and tested; 55 engineers worked on the process. And > It is expected to fetch between $500,000 (£312,000) and $750,000. If they took the cost of that time and work and donated it directly to the charity how much would it have been?

Ah, but it's not a direct equivalent. Do you think Jony Ive's contract with Apple allows moonlighting?

Re: Jonathan Ive designs Leica camera for Red charity

#8
post #4

> 85 days and more than 735 hours > more than 550 models and 1,000 prototype parts were made and tested... 55 engineers worked on the process. Uhh... I think they spent more developing this than what it will fetch. Wouldn't it have been better to just donate the money? A 500k donation at the expense of that many resources...

You assume they aren't getting anything else from that. Presumably it also counts as R&D for future products.

Re: Jonathan Ive designs Leica camera for Red charity

#9
post #2

I'm always uneasy with the idea of (RED) charity: the message is "save the world by buying stuff". It's just consumerism with a bit of karma, no?

I think it's more "you're going to buy this product anyway, so why not go with the model that will help a charity?".
Post reply on HN