Live data from Hacker News

The new Galaxy Note 3 is region-locked

gigaom.com

151–160 of 233 posts

Re: The new Galaxy Note 3 is region-locked

#152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes I do, it just comes from Apple themselves. There are several icons you can't get rid of on the iphone for apple products and services.

I hope you're trolling or joking. Comparing a Pizza Hut bookmark with iOS built-in apps, just wow. I mean, I knew Apple haters were dense but this is excessive.

Really, I think the same. Comparing just a browser bookmark which doesn't always come in your way with an ever intrusive app and loving crapware just because it's from their loved company? I mean, I knew Apple fans are dense, but this is excessive.

Re: The new Galaxy Note 3 is region-locked

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No. It's a Samsung problem. You don't see crapware on iPhones do you?

Yes I do, it just comes from Apple themselves. There are several icons you can't get rid of on the iphone for apple products and services.

And IMMEDIATELY the fandroids come out and pretend that we should be talking about how bad Apple is. +1 for the comment somewhere about how dense Android fans appear to be.

However bad you think Apple might be, Samsung is far, far worse, just much less successful and slick about it. I had thought the old adage about "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" was only believed by halfwits, apparently I was wrong.

Re: The new Galaxy Note 3 is region-locked

#154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Comparing oranges with oranges - you compare the "bundle" cost with the price you'd pay if you simply took the phone on credit from any electronics shop with the same upfront payment and length of contract, and added a cheap no-handset mobile plan. The phone qualifies as "subsidized" only if buying it from your mobile company turns out cheaper than if buying it separately. Generally it isn't.

Where do I obtain one of these "cheap no-handset mobile plans" on my carrier of choice?

You can do such a comparison probably in any country worldwide except US. For US in particular the "subsidy" answer is simple - no, you're not getting any subsidies, in mobile comms pricing you're getting ripped off, and noone has any idea on how to fix it.

Re: The new Galaxy Note 3 is region-locked

#155
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is a difference between default apps and apps for which the manufacturer was paid to put on the phone in order to advertise to the purchaser. Apple does not get paid by another company to load its default apps onto the phone.

What do you call newsstand? It's a purely magazine advertising service. Would PizzaHut app be acceptable if it was called PizzaStand and allowed you to select from multiple pizza vendors?

Call it FoodStand, let if fill with food vendors in my neighbourhood (preferably those who offer delivery), and I'm all for it.

That would transform PizzaHut from an obnoxious ad ("seller oriented") to a genuinely useful option I would probably use on occasion ("customer oriented").

I dislike intrusive ads (and spending good money on a physical gadget just to be met by "congratulations, and incidentally you've also bought into a lifelong relationship with this pizza vendor" is intrusive).

But I don't mind being told that "newspapers are here, food is over there"; I might even find it useful at some point.

I still think it would be nice if Apple would let me hide the non-deletable apps I don't use: Let me hide the newsstand icon, pop it up again if I ever decide to subcribe to a newspaper.

But the newsstand doesn't grate me the way a permanent link to any particular magazine would. Any particular magazine is unlikely to be my favorite, it might even be one I hate. That doesn't imply that I hate magazines, newsstands, pizza or food in general.

Re: The new Galaxy Note 3 is region-locked

#156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is disappointing -- I really like my barebones brother laser printer, I thought they might be one of the few honest printer manufacturers.

I think inkjets and lasers are basically different companies. From every vendor. The laser products just work, the inkjet products just don't.

I could not agree more. I also have a Brother Laser, and it's been rock solid for years. Inkjets were always a waste of money, ink, and time!

Re: The new Galaxy Note 3 is region-locked

#157
post #27

Disappointing, but not a surprise: 1. Galaxy S 3 includes undeletable Pizza Hut bookmark http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1707047 2. Galaxy custom web browser allows random web sites to make links that wipe and reset the phone: http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/117422-samsung-galaxy-s-3-re...

All those complaining about Vodaphone S3 coming with a little bookmark which can't be deleted, and still somehow don't find Apple's crapware which can't be uninstalled too bad, two things: 1) That was really only the stock browser. You can very easily install much better browsers and make them the default - Chrome, Firefox, Dolphin browser. Isn't it amazing and unheard of in Apple's world? 2) And, FYI, you can still delete those bookmarks by a small trick, without rooting. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1707047

Re: The new Galaxy Note 3 is region-locked

#158
post #14

My HP printer is region-locked. When I moved from Europe to the US it refused to accept ink cartridges bought in the US.

I have to ask: why move a printer from Europe to the US? Buying a new printer including cartridges would have been considerably cheaper.

Many people move almost all the stuff they have, for example when they get a good enough relocation amount. Why even waste $50 from your pockets when you already have a good and working printer?

Re: The new Galaxy Note 3 is region-locked

#159
I'm eagerly awaiting some clarification on this. I was going to buy a note 3 the day it becomes available through my carrier. If there is no workaround to the region locking I'll stick with my blackberry 9900 until a better option comes along (perhaps the HTC One Max).

Re: The new Galaxy Note 3 is region-locked

#160
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The exception are models like Apple's where they've figured out how to consistently drive profits by focusing on the consumer and using the phone as a platform for selling other things (i.e.: apps and content like movies and music) -- the carriers are almost incidental in Apple's model. Almost. This is absolutely untrue. Apple's business model is to sell $650 phones to carriers, who then turn around and sell them t…

To an extent, you're right, I overstated my case. They make their profits from hardware, yes, but they don't sell to carriers. They sell to consumers, some of whom buy from individual carriers but the majority channel for iPhone sales is from Apple itself. No other phone maker can say that. Secondly, Apple's profit is uniquely enriched because it has built the platfrom that it has -- again, no other phone manufacture…

Horace Dediu makes the case that carriers pay more for Apple hardware because Apple does a better job of getting high value customers onto the network (use more data or more expensive contracts).
Post reply on HN