Earlier quoted context omitted.
> This is a very reasonable bar when it comes to hiring employees all across the country It depends what country you're in. ( http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/1515825.stm ) > A head chef who was sacked for speaking Welsh at work has been awarded more than £10,000 in compensation. > The award for racial discrimination and unfair dismissal comes five years after Gwilym Williams was sacked from a hotel near Caernarfon a…
I don't get it. He was a head chef in Wales where the national languages are English and Welsh, and he was able to speak one of those two languages fluently. I don't know the full story, but it sounds like he was also being discriminatory and out to make a political / nationalist point by refusing to communicate whatsoever in English. If he was Russian or Chinese and nobody could understand him in either English or W…
The story that's been told is that his English speaking bosses wanted him to speak English in the kitchen. He refused, speaking Welsh to the Welsh speakers and English to the English speakers.
They sacked him, claiming it had nothing to do with the language.
A tribunal found that it was about his use of language.
> If he was Russian or Chinese and nobody could understand him in either English or Welsh, I don't think it would legally be discrimination to fire him (nor morally).
I'd be interested to know what would have happened if it had been a language other than Welsh.
If there were a bunch of people who spoke Russian fluently, and he spoke Russian to them and English to the English speakers.