Earlier quoted context omitted.
Art for art's sake is great, but it doesn't mean artists should get a free pass to do whatever they want and the rest of us digging coal mines and waiting tables give them money for art we don't like. And where has anyone said we should? I didn't see OP demanding public subsidies. You're just attacking a dumb strawman.
His wife, the crowdfund backers, and the net loss to society by him taking himself out of productive business. Those are not 'dumb strawmans'. And I wasn't talking about him in that comment, but the various starving artists who usually free ride on spouse/family/friends/welfare.
At least he probably learned useful skills building his game. What do you have to show for the time spent here?