IIRC Peopleware pointed out a study where they compared two groups of programmers, those working in a quiet environment and those working with music. Given identical assignments, both groups completed it in roughly the same (median) amount of time. However, the assignment was such that there was a "shortcut", i.e. if you thought hard enough about the requirements a much easier solution was possible. Only the programm…
I’m Thinking. Please. Be Quiet.
51–60 of 252 posts
Re: I’m Thinking. Please. Be Quiet.
#52I'll bite. From my biased viewpoint, based on who complains most, people prefer the quiet more as they get older. Kids don't seem to care, middle aged prefer some separation, and my elders can be derailed by a greeting. I've always assumed it was the skill to tune out, but perhaps theirs are weightier thoughts. Personally, I need some mindless noise in the background, but nothing with any meaningful signal. The noise…
> I'll bite. From my biased viewpoint, based on who complains most, people prefer the quiet more as they get older. Kids don't seem to care, middle aged prefer some separation, and my elders can be derailed by a greeting. Or maybe, older people complain more about noise because they actually know what sane conditions are and how life was back when ADD wasn't a thing yet.
Re: I’m Thinking. Please. Be Quiet.
#53IIRC Peopleware pointed out a study where they compared two groups of programmers, those working in a quiet environment and those working with music. Given identical assignments, both groups completed it in roughly the same (median) amount of time. However, the assignment was such that there was a "shortcut", i.e. if you thought hard enough about the requirements a much easier solution was possible. Only the programm…
How was it a shortcut if both groups completed it at the same time?
Re: I’m Thinking. Please. Be Quiet.
#54IIRC Peopleware pointed out a study where they compared two groups of programmers, those working in a quiet environment and those working with music. Given identical assignments, both groups completed it in roughly the same (median) amount of time. However, the assignment was such that there was a "shortcut", i.e. if you thought hard enough about the requirements a much easier solution was possible. Only the programm…
How was it a shortcut if both groups completed it at the same time?
Re: I’m Thinking. Please. Be Quiet.
#55IIRC Peopleware pointed out a study where they compared two groups of programmers, those working in a quiet environment and those working with music. Given identical assignments, both groups completed it in roughly the same (median) amount of time. However, the assignment was such that there was a "shortcut", i.e. if you thought hard enough about the requirements a much easier solution was possible. Only the programm…
How was it a shortcut if both groups completed it at the same time?
The Cornell experiment, however, contained a hidden wild card. The
specification required that an output data stream be formed through
a series of manipulations on numbers in the input data stream. For
example, participants had to shift each number two digits to the
left and then divide by one hundred and so on, perhaps completing
a dozen operations in total. Although the specification never said
it, the net effect of all the operations was that each output number
was necessarily equal to its input number. Some people realized
this and others did not. Of those who figured it out, the overwhelming
majority came from the quiet room.Re: I’m Thinking. Please. Be Quiet.
#56Re: I’m Thinking. Please. Be Quiet.
#57It's an opinion piece, so it's sort of anecdotal and hazy by nature, I guess (ymmv). I'm not going to complain too viscerally about it. The problem I have, though, is that the entire piece basically says "noise kills productivity" but the only linked research is saying that "exposure to aircraft noise increases morning saliva cortisol levels in women, which could be of relevance for noise-related cardiovascular effec…
Re: I’m Thinking. Please. Be Quiet.
#581) Sound isn't necessarily distracting. Sometimes it could be helpful. Focus@Will ( https://www.focusatwill.com/science/science-primer/ ) is based on this. 2) You can usually find quiet if you want to rather easily. 3) If you're going to argue that society (or parts of society) should be more quiet, you have to be specific about what parts, and about why restricting sound outweighs the costs. The costs of restricting…
That might be your experience, but it certainly isn't the experience of the people on this thread; of the author of the original post; or of most people I know.
Re: I’m Thinking. Please. Be Quiet.
#59IIRC Peopleware pointed out a study where they compared two groups of programmers, those working in a quiet environment and those working with music. Given identical assignments, both groups completed it in roughly the same (median) amount of time. However, the assignment was such that there was a "shortcut", i.e. if you thought hard enough about the requirements a much easier solution was possible. Only the programm…
Re: I’m Thinking. Please. Be Quiet.
#60When I work at home, I am actually more productive coding than I am in the office due to having more control over both noise and distractions.
I can't speak to research, I just know I prefer environments that are either quiet or the noise is specifically relevant to myself and colleagues over hearing the ramblings of disparate teams in the background.