Live data from Hacker News

Ripping Off Young America: The College-Loan Scandal

rollingstone.com

221–230 of 277 posts

Re: Ripping Off Young America: The College-Loan Scandal

#221

Whatever happened to personal responsibility? You're 18, you can smoke, drive, join the army and take out gigantic loans you can't repay. It's a fine line between making it easy for everyone to go to college and making it easy for a mathematically disinclined person to take out a huge loan for a dumb reason. It would be great for everyone to have the chance to go to some college. For some reason, people seem to immed…

> Should more be done to push people into in-state schools, where tuition is often orders of magnitude cheaper?

State schools have rapidly become diploma mills over the last 10 years where tuition has sky rocketed.

> No one forced them to go to college, especially not one that leaves them $40k in debt.

Spoken like someone that has taken a blind eye to the societal pressures we've continued to put on each other: "go to college, get the job."

Re: Ripping Off Young America: The College-Loan Scandal

#222
post #7

Amazing, perspective is everything. I don't deny that college kids are being taken advantage of. Graduating from a small liberal arts college in South Dakota that no one's ever heard of with a degree is Culture Studies and 80k in debt really is a rip off. The flipside of this coin however is someone like me. My parents are immigrants and I was the first to go to school. To my parents, the fact that someone would be e…

"In some countries, you don't even have the OPTION to take out a loan to go to school" In some countries, like mine (Uruguay) university-level education is free :) (though postgraduate studies are paid). I think China is the biggest example of free university education. EDIT: I was wrong, about U$ 2000/year and rising apparently. At least our bazillion psychologists and communication majors (equivalent to the dreaded…

> I was wrong about China, but apparently it is free in India.

Yeah, if you can get into the limited government education programs. Most people pay oodles of money to be educated in private colleges 'affiliated' to universities.

Let's take the example of Tamil Nadu (a prosperous Southern state in India). Compare the colleges that comprise Anna University (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_University#Campus_and_coll...) and the colleges _affiliated_ to Anna University (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Colleges_%26_Institutio...).

Re: Ripping Off Young America: The College-Loan Scandal

#223

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I categorically reject the notion that STEM does not teach critical thinking. After all, STEM fields have a built in reality check for one's thoughts. If you design an airplane and it doesn't fly, you're forced to develop critical thinking skills so that doesn't happen again. Physical reality isn't going to bend to your thoughts.

Does it teach empathy, teach a way to see others as we see ourselves and imagine other people complexly?

As someone who has both a liberal arts and a STEM degree, I resent the insinuation that STEM majors are drooling sociopaths who don't know how to relate to other people. Also, there's more to liberal arts than "empathy". Thanks.

Re: Ripping Off Young America: The College-Loan Scandal

#224
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Honestly, I'm okay with the student loan system, I just think schools need to face tuition caps to be eligible for federal student loans. My wife and I have substantial student loans from law school. We got good jobs and can afford to pay. Meanwhile, lots of people don't and can't, and rely on the governments very generous and flexible repayment terms. As long as the program as a whole turns a profit, its a cross-sub…

Let me take this a step further then. If we're going to cap tuition (price controls), why not increase taxes as well? College becomes much cheaper ($10K for your degree, not your semester), and society, the student, and every future employer benefits. I understand people don't like taxes sometimes. Even me. But with them, I buy civilization.

There is a place for that, but the thing I like about the student loan system is that the people who benefit from the system pay for it. I think we have too many taxes in the US where the benefits aren't broadly distributed, which undermines support for those programs.

Re: Ripping Off Young America: The College-Loan Scandal

#225
The British system is an interesting twist on it, government loans pay for the majority of people to go to university, then the loans are subject to interest at the rate of inflation, and are repaid at 9% of your pre-tax earnings over £15000 per year. So, if you earn £25000 a year, you repay £900 a year.

Re: Ripping Off Young America: The College-Loan Scandal

#226
post #179

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Whose fault is that? They didn't read what they're signing for? Isn't that their own damn fault? [...] No one forced them to go to college Yes, but it was an offer they couldn't refuse. One of my favorite results from game theory is that sometimes more options lead to everyone being worse off. Let me explain. Suppose in scenario A only the very wealthy or the very smart and dedicated (scholarships) have the option t…

Yes, but it was an offer they couldn't refuse. Not quite that simple - students have tons of choices. They could choose a school with a lower tuition. They could stay in-state so as to avoid the much more "out of state tuition". They could opt for a degree with a higher chance of getting a job. They could opt for a degree with a higher average salary. They could work full-time to pay off the loans while they go to sc…

That would be fine and dandy, except employers discriminate against lower-tuition schools and even those are getting more expensive each year.

Re: Ripping Off Young America: The College-Loan Scandal

#227
I wouldn't call myself a victim of the college-loan scandal. I would however call myself an unwilling participant. I see plenty of opining in this thread so far. Might as well jump in :)

One big recurring element in many of these comments is this idea that the private schools are a rip-off, while the cuddly old state schools are the choice of the smart, frugal, cost-conscious twentysomething. There's just one problem: state tuition has been rising faster than inflation and real wages for quite a while now. Certainly not as quickly Ivy League institutions of course. And no doubt State U will be cheaper than Ivy U. But let's not fool ourselves into thinking that State U is the panacea to the cost problem. While it might have made sense at one point to live at home and work part time --or full time but only during the summer-- now it doesn't matter what you do for work because it couldn't possibly pay off the tuition and fees for the semester and leave you with something left over to coast on. And that's assuming of course that you're still with Mom and Dad who've got room and board covered for you.

Consider my own anecdotal case. At 18 I was accepted to Colorado School of Mines. Nearly a full ride. I still had to come up with about 3k over the summer. After 8 weeks of stocking shelves on the night shift at the local Wal-Mart, I was close enough. Academically I crashed and burned my first semester. Thankfully I still retained aid while on probation. But then sophomore year came. My old aid remained while prices jumped by 4.5 percent on out of state tuition. I crunched the numbers and figured that if such a trend continued, I could be looking at tens of thousands in loan obligations. Combined with a depression of most epic proportions, I dropped out and returned to Texas shortly before finals my third semester. I then spent three semesters at home doing the Austin Community College grind, picking up as many credits as I could, trying desperately to get into UT Austin --where I had previously been admitted at 18-- before resigning myself to Texas State. ACC was a wonderful cost to benefit ratio despite its size at least. At Texas State, not so much. I'm nearly entirely on the hook for 4.5k in tuition/fees every semester for an Electrical Engineering degree that I still had at least five semesters to go in finishing. And of course that 4.5k doesn't factor in a grueling Austin-San Marcos commute that of course implies not just gas but maintenance as well. Really, I'm looking at about 30k in loan obligations anyway by the time graduation comes around this Spring.

My transcript is a lost cause, no doubt. I'm sure UT Austin feels they dodged a bullet when they reviewed my records from Colorado and mailed off their form rejection letters that I still keep in a box somewhere next to the old admission packet. I wouldn't expect anyone to give me free money in exchange for the straight A's they consider to pass for academic rigor, because my track record provides ample evidence that I simply won't pull that off. I am intimately aware that my own personal disregard for grades, the only even half-reliable indicator for universities to gauge potential (half-reliable), leaves me cut off in ways that are my own doing.

But for fuck's sake, I'd really like to be able to pay my own way without taking out tens of thousands in loans to do it or otherwise take a decade of time getting a 4-year degree. I'd like to have the experience of my aunts and uncles whose tuition bills were lucky to reach 4 figures in a given semester. Really, if I was obligated to spend 4 years educating myself, I feel I could have done a right sight better on my own rather than spending the first two years dicking around getting the "well rounded" education that I had already spent 12 years prior attaining in grade school. But an employer will absolutely require that four year degree to even consider me --before they then spend another year or two bringing me up to speed on the state of the art before I can really be productive on the team, of course.

I keep hearing about all these choices I made. Quite frankly, there weren't that many options to begin with if your goal was to be anything other than a working class wage slave for the rest of your life.

Re: Ripping Off Young America: The College-Loan Scandal

#228

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's a fine prediction. And yet, student loans were only made so hard to discharge due to changes in the law in 1996 and 2000. And prior to 1996 and 2000, student loans were offered at much less than the exorbitant rates you predict, and lenders made nice fat profits on them even so. And no, there was no significant abuse of the system - after all, there's always a judge involved in bankruptcy proceedings, who has…

Obviously there are zero confounding variables in the late 1990's and this is a perfectly controlled experiment.

[deleted]

Re: Ripping Off Young America: The College-Loan Scandal

#229

Whatever happened to personal responsibility? You're 18, you can smoke, drive, join the army and take out gigantic loans you can't repay. It's a fine line between making it easy for everyone to go to college and making it easy for a mathematically disinclined person to take out a huge loan for a dumb reason. It would be great for everyone to have the chance to go to some college. For some reason, people seem to immed…

> Should more be done to push people into in-state schools, where tuition is often orders of magnitude cheaper? State schools have rapidly become diploma mills over the last 10 years where tuition has sky rocketed. > No one forced them to go to college, especially not one that leaves them $40k in debt. Spoken like someone that has taken a blind eye to the societal pressures we've continued to put on each other: "go t…

[deleted]

Re: Ripping Off Young America: The College-Loan Scandal

#230
post #164
post #123

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're basically saying let's ask people not to accept free money that's being thrown at them. That's not impossible, but I think restricting bad loans is more compatible with human nature.

How are you going to restrict bad loans without asking people (the government) not to accept free money? It's the same problem.

Sorry, I meant the universities are accepting free money and that's why they won't reduce prices. If the government refuses to make "underwater" loans on degrees that are not worth the cost, we should expect prices to go down.
Post reply on HN