Skeuocard
71–80 of 206 posts
Re: Skeuocard
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've seen the Visa, MC and AmEx logos on too many CC forms so far to think that showing their logo is a no-no.
I'm assuming he means the issuing bank, not just the Visa/MC/AmEx logos, as those ARE already displayed on the skeuocard.
Re: Skeuocard
#73Upvoting because this is so beautifully executed and I'd love to see people test this out on their checkout process. That said, my experience indicates that this is not going to convert well. To mirror the author's own quote: "Every question a user has to ask themselves during the checkout process is another reason for them not to complete it." What's presented here is a drastically different experience from the norm…
Agreed, I stumbled for a second before realizing I could type a name in the card, but I would love to see stuff like this become popular. Also, on Chrome 28/Mac, the validation flow seems to have some issues. I can put invalid months like "22" or "00" on the card without it highlighting the month. But it looks like the month needs to be accurate before it will show me my Luhn checkdigit is wrong. After playing with i…
I didn't realize this until I read your comment.
Re: Skeuocard
#74Upvoting because this is so beautifully executed and I'd love to see people test this out on their checkout process. That said, my experience indicates that this is not going to convert well. To mirror the author's own quote: "Every question a user has to ask themselves during the checkout process is another reason for them not to complete it." What's presented here is a drastically different experience from the norm…
Re: Skeuocard
#75Re: Skeuocard
#76I can think of all sorts of ways for it to drop conversions if it fails, but it is so perfectly done that I kind of don't care.
I'm going to keep an eye on this because it has the potential to really increase the comfort people have when entering a credit card. And because it is beautiful.
Re: Skeuocard
#77Not something I'd use right now. It's too clunky compared to just having some textboxs on the page. I'm not a fan of skeuomorphism in general though, so I'm probably a hard sell.
Doesn't mean you shouldn't keep trying. Thanks for putting this out there. I love the article, btw.
Re: Skeuocard
#78Re: Skeuocard
#79Re: Skeuocard
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
>"Beyond that it has to load images dynamically based on card type which, on a slow or interrupted connection, will create even more confusion." This actually happened when I refreshed the page while playing with it and it was replaced by a normal form. Pretty handy. I think I will also be testing it out.
Not sure why the author included that. You can easily preload the images or settle for a text-only implementation.