Thailand's "Foreign Exchange Administration and Policy Department" has advised that, quoting from the OP: "the following Bitcoin activities are illegal in Thailand: buying Bitcoins; selling Bitcoins; buying any goods or services in exchange for Bitcoins; selling any goods or services for Bitcoins; sending Bitcoins to anyone located outside of Thailand; receiving Bitcoins from anyone located outside of Thailand." We c…
Bitcoin ruled illegal in Thailand
101–107 of 107 posts
Re: Bitcoin ruled illegal in Thailand
#102And I agree with the other comments on here which say that this will drive trade (in Thailand at least) underground.
Disclaimer: I'm bullish on bitcoin.
Re: Bitcoin ruled illegal in Thailand
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
They haven't outlawed chuck e cheese coins, or any other arcade that uses its own currency instead of dollars. Why would bit coin be any different?
As far as I remember, the country sets a limit for this. Once a "pseudo" currency reaches that amount (in circulation), it is required to be "authorized" (or not) by the country. Now that was before bicoin existed. So, probably the laws will soon be re-written to take that into account.
Re: Bitcoin ruled illegal in Thailand
#104Bitcoin was not ruled illegal. The Bank of Thailand has no legal power. A few senior members of the bank saying something is illegal does not make it illegal. The Foreign Exchange Administration and Policy Department are merely departments of the bank, not branches of the legislative government. In other words the title "Bitcoin ruled illegal in Thailand" should be changed to "Bank of Thailand wishes Bitcoin to be il…
Thanks I was just about to write that.
This story smells. If you go up to some officials in Thailand and ask them whether or not something is legal, they'll say it's illegal.
No laws have been passed that would make BTC illegal, and nobody has been charged with BTC related activity. So I'd say at this point, it's perfectly legal.
Might be just a stunt to get attention?! Viral marketing?
Re: Bitcoin ruled illegal in Thailand
#105Bitcoin was not ruled illegal. The Bank of Thailand has no legal power. A few senior members of the bank saying something is illegal does not make it illegal. The Foreign Exchange Administration and Policy Department are merely departments of the bank, not branches of the legislative government. In other words the title "Bitcoin ruled illegal in Thailand" should be changed to "Bank of Thailand wishes Bitcoin to be il…
Indeed.. upon closer inspection all that happened is this guy approached the Bank of Thailand and (foolishly) deferred to their authority to ask if he could trade coins using their bank. This always results in bankers telling you no, and no surprise they said no, but doesn't mean you can't use cash on the streets, just so long as no banks are used. Thai parliament hasn't passed any laws declaring virtual currencies i…
The only reason I can think of is so that they say no, and you get some free publicity?
Re: Bitcoin ruled illegal in Thailand
#106It will be interesting to see how actively they enforce this new ruling. Given that paedo-tourists are effectively given a free pass in Thailand I find it odd that Bitcoin would work it's way to the top of the agenda.
This is not to say that the story makes Thailand look good. The ruling elite have a strong tendency to blame many things on foreigners, and since coming out against Bitcoin will effect practically no one in Thailand (which is not exactly a hotbed of Bitcoin usage) they get to blame another imagined foreign threat to the Kingdom and take credit for saving the country. Remember, they made a similar stance against, Open Source Software, not long after the military coup not that many years ago (and like Obama in Egypt, the Bush administration illegally continued to give them military aide without anyone in America even noticing).
Re: Bitcoin ruled illegal in Thailand
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
Me either. I don't believe in information ownership.
I don't see how the issues are linked. Do they simply stem from a common philosophy, or does a disbelief in information ownership somehow entail inability to punish for possession?
What does it mean to possess bits? Do they have to be on a physical media on my property? What if I have a network drive? Do they have to be on a server that I have access to? Does that mean that we're all in possession of everything that is made public on the Internet?
There are ways to answer these questions, but I'm not convinced that we have anything to gain from the government doing so.