Twitter Bootstrap Now Powering 1% of The Web
21–30 of 73 posts
Re: Twitter Bootstrap Now Powering 1% of The Web
#22I sometimes use stuff because everyone else is using it. And then I wonder why I did that. I recently removed bootstrap from a website I have that is composed entirely of static HTML documents [1]. It's a teaser / marketing site for my current project. The sample sites looked nice and I figured that since I and CSS are of basically nodding acquaintance -- why not? I discovered that Bootstrap was just too featuresome…
Can i recommend Foundation by Zurb, it's like bootstrap but better IMHO. It allows you to download and use the parts you ned and nothing more.
Re: Twitter Bootstrap Now Powering 1% of The Web
#23Re: Twitter Bootstrap Now Powering 1% of The Web
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
I did have "styled by" as the original headline. Bounced it off a few people who were not that sure what I meant so changed it to "powered by".
So you checked the headline with a few people who are not in your target audience?
Re: Twitter Bootstrap Now Powering 1% of The Web
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
I know it is not quantifiable but the effectively free marketing and goodwill that Twitter get from open sourcing Bootstrap must be worth many millions.
That may very well be, but personally, I have no objection to this at all, b/c: - supporting Twitter does not do any damage (unless you'd argue it's subject to the mass surveillance problem and should therefor be avoided) - you're not being locked in, you can drop it at any time without any consequences
Re: Twitter Bootstrap Now Powering 1% of The Web
#26Re: Twitter Bootstrap Now Powering 1% of The Web
#27I sometimes use stuff because everyone else is using it. And then I wonder why I did that. I recently removed bootstrap from a website I have that is composed entirely of static HTML documents [1]. It's a teaser / marketing site for my current project. The sample sites looked nice and I figured that since I and CSS are of basically nodding acquaintance -- why not? I discovered that Bootstrap was just too featuresome…
Re: Twitter Bootstrap Now Powering 1% of The Web
#28I sometimes use stuff because everyone else is using it. And then I wonder why I did that. I recently removed bootstrap from a website I have that is composed entirely of static HTML documents [1]. It's a teaser / marketing site for my current project. The sample sites looked nice and I figured that since I and CSS are of basically nodding acquaintance -- why not? I discovered that Bootstrap was just too featuresome…
i) In the past I spent a lot of time with designers and now I can design a site from scratch myself (I am not a web developer). Before bootstrap sites designed by me looked very well on Mosaic :-)
ii) If I work with a designer I need to spec a lot of details (bullets, headings, columns, colors) and how the fit together. With bootstrap I know that I can change what I don't like.
iii) I can then talk with a designer to only change what I don't like. So Bootstrap is a foundation base.
An example of this is http://www.nektra.com where I use Python Django and Mezzanine as CMS. I've not implemented yet the last designer version which is better. Another site http://www.securecouponcodes.com is just plain bootstrap and was implemented a little bit after the framework was released. If it not were by bootstrap the second site would be delayed since it was implemented only by me.
Re: Twitter Bootstrap Now Powering 1% of The Web
#291% of the indexed web, which might be less than 10% of the web at large (see for example here: http://www.quora.com/What-percentage-of-the-web-does-Google-... )
I think no one would miss a thing if we dropped all pages past 5 from the index :P
Re: Twitter Bootstrap Now Powering 1% of The Web
#30That's really impressive, if accurate. If so many people are using Bootstrap as a default style, it makes me wonder if maybe the default way browser style HTML element shouldn't be closer to what Bootstrap does?
bootstrap is just a more pleasant baseline than unstyled markup.