That's awesome and I'm a big fan of Bootstrap and use it for nearly every new project. However I think 'powered' is taking things a bit far. Maybe 'styling' 1% of the web or 'powering the front-end' of 1% of the web. Wordpress uses the term 'powered' and that's fine because they actually do power a huge number of sites. That doesn't apply to most large sites running Bootstrap. Take Coinbase for example. They're still…
I did have "styled by" as the original headline. Bounced it off a few people who were not that sure what I meant so changed it to "powered by".
Twitter Bootstrap Now Powering 1% of The Web
11–20 of 73 posts
Re: Twitter Bootstrap Now Powering 1% of The Web
#12"I recently pulled a random selection of 10 websites from the sites I visit every day and found clear Twitter Bootstrap signatures on 0 of them."
They claim to have 1% of the web not 10 or more. Thus checking 10 specific websites is meaning less.
Re: Twitter Bootstrap Now Powering 1% of The Web
#13Re: Twitter Bootstrap Now Powering 1% of The Web
#141% of the indexed web, which might be less than 10% of the web at large (see for example here: http://www.quora.com/What-percentage-of-the-web-does-Google-... )
Re: Twitter Bootstrap Now Powering 1% of The Web
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
They claim to have 1% of the web not 10 or more. Thus checking 10 specific websites is meaning less.
~1% of a large sample. I think that when N = 100 million you can make fairly strong claims, assuming non-systematic sample bias.
Regardless I think that the type of the website also matters to statistics. I guess that none of the top 100 in alexa uses bootstrap but I guess that more than 20% of the startups sites from the past year are using bootstrap.
Re: Twitter Bootstrap Now Powering 1% of The Web
#16It means our resources are allocated in the most intelligent way.
Re: Twitter Bootstrap Now Powering 1% of The Web
#17It is encouraging to see that the world (both developers and "consumers") "invests" in open source projects. It means our resources are allocated in the most intelligent way.
Re: Twitter Bootstrap Now Powering 1% of The Web
#18I sometimes use stuff because everyone else is using it. And then I wonder why I did that. I recently removed bootstrap from a website I have that is composed entirely of static HTML documents [1]. It's a teaser / marketing site for my current project. The sample sites looked nice and I figured that since I and CSS are of basically nodding acquaintance -- why not? I discovered that Bootstrap was just too featuresome…
Re: Twitter Bootstrap Now Powering 1% of The Web
#19It is encouraging to see that the world (both developers and "consumers") "invests" in open source projects. It means our resources are allocated in the most intelligent way.
I know it is not quantifiable but the effectively free marketing and goodwill that Twitter get from open sourcing Bootstrap must be worth many millions.
- supporting Twitter does not do any damage (unless you'd argue it's subject to the mass surveillance problem and should therefor be avoided)
- you're not being locked in, you can drop it at any time without any consequences