Live data from Hacker News

House of Lords debates pardon for Alan Turing

bbc.co.uk

61–70 of 161 posts

Re: House of Lords debates pardon for Alan Turing

#61
post #5

They should pardon all the people convicted under that law. Not just the famous, useful ones.

I believe they plan to, and that is what is being debated, they are just using Alan Turing as the most famous example of an deceased person that should be pardoned.

Yes - sometimes it takes someone famous to make the issue public, and everyone else will benefit. It was an absolute travesty and shame for what they did to him, and we are all the worse for it.

Re: House of Lords debates pardon for Alan Turing

#62
The bigger issue here is that people look to governments and religions for pardons, permission and other validation. People that see some kind of meaning in empty gestures like a posthumous pardon (after shaming and chemically castrating the man) are grossly mislead.

Buying into the hype of government is what gives governments the power to commit senseless crimes like what was done to Alan Turing and many, many crimes that are much worse. The correct answer to "should the UK government pardon Alan Turing?" is "fuck off".

I view the gay marriage issue in the same light. I have gay friends that care deeply about marriage equality, but as much as I love them and they are my friends, I simply cannot sympathize. My answer to them is: "Live your life, do want you want to do, don't ask the government or anyone else for permission".

If worried about my status as defined by the U.S. government and the fairness I can expect from U.S. government, I would just kill myself now. Thankfully I realize that government is just another scam for me to avoid to the best of my ability.

Re: House of Lords debates pardon for Alan Turing

#63
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I said majority of people, not Americans. My statement stands correct. Look at what other countries have done to recently stem gay culture: Russia recently passed a unanimous (436-0) vote which banned gay propaganda[1]. Homosexuals acceptance is pushed hard in the western media, but don't let that skew your worldview. Reactionary responses are not uncommon. [1] http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/11/russia-law-b…

I have registered an account on HN simply to respond to you. You are a despicable piece of worthless trash. Thank you.

As much as I agree with this sentiment, I think it's better to downvote him to invisibility and not respond to his comments.

Re: House of Lords debates pardon for Alan Turing

#64
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So, how are things waaaay over there on the wrong side of history?

You keep arguing with logical fallacies, but I'll respond anyway. Russia is doing quite well and just became the 5th largest economy[1]. They also have a news station (Russia Today) which reports on real issues - unlike western "mainstream" media. You act as if Russia is some backwater slump and not a growing modern nation. Meanwhile the western world is teetering into bankruptcy. You won't know which side of history…

It's interesting that you talk about others' logical fallacies, yet you started the thread with a fallacy (appeal to majority).

Re: House of Lords debates pardon for Alan Turing

#65
post #10

Like the majority of people, I oppose gay marriage. But what the British government did with chemical castration to Alan Turing and others is absolutely reprehensible - and they should pardon all of them. Let's not conflate these issues please.

Why does it matter what the majority of people think?

Re: House of Lords debates pardon for Alan Turing

#66

The bigger issue here is that people look to governments and religions for pardons, permission and other validation. People that see some kind of meaning in empty gestures like a posthumous pardon (after shaming and chemically castrating the man) are grossly mislead. Buying into the hype of government is what gives governments the power to commit senseless crimes like what was done to Alan Turing and many, many crime…

> "Live your life, do want you want to do, don't ask the government or anyone else for permission"

That's what Turing was trying to do. It resulted in:

>shaming and chemically castrating the man

>If worried about my status as defined by the [UK] government and the fairness I can expect from [UK] government, I would just kill myself now.

The issue goes a bit deeper than superficial validation.

Re: House of Lords debates pardon for Alan Turing

#67

The bigger issue here is that people look to governments and religions for pardons, permission and other validation. People that see some kind of meaning in empty gestures like a posthumous pardon (after shaming and chemically castrating the man) are grossly mislead. Buying into the hype of government is what gives governments the power to commit senseless crimes like what was done to Alan Turing and many, many crime…

You can live your life the way you want right up to the point where you want to visit your husband in the hospital or inherit the estate of your dead wife. Then these legal things start to matter.

Re: House of Lords debates pardon for Alan Turing

#68
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I said majority of people, not Americans. My statement stands correct. Look at what other countries have done to recently stem gay culture: Russia recently passed a unanimous (436-0) vote which banned gay propaganda[1]. Homosexuals acceptance is pushed hard in the western media, but don't let that skew your worldview. Reactionary responses are not uncommon. [1] http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/11/russia-law-b…

I have registered an account on HN simply to respond to you. You are a despicable piece of worthless trash. Thank you.

These are the kinds of attacks that people who stand for traditional marriage have to face. A bigoted army of people who can't muster a better argument than vulgar name calling. The irony is that they claim to stand against intolerance...

Re: House of Lords debates pardon for Alan Turing

#69

The bigger issue here is that people look to governments and religions for pardons, permission and other validation. People that see some kind of meaning in empty gestures like a posthumous pardon (after shaming and chemically castrating the man) are grossly mislead. Buying into the hype of government is what gives governments the power to commit senseless crimes like what was done to Alan Turing and many, many crime…

Nobody is asking for permission. We are asking for equal protection under the law.

There are dozens of boring issues that are bundled with this issue. For me, repeal of DOMA means that if I got hit by a bus tomorrow, my husband would be able to continue to live in our home and not have to sell it to pay taxes on his "windfall".

Re: House of Lords debates pardon for Alan Turing

#70
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Like the majority of people, I oppose gay marriage. That is factually incorrect. The majority of the population support marriage equality.

Majority of which population?

Majority of people - so the world population.
Post reply on HN