> Engelbart hated our present-day systems. I'm not trying to say "[citation needed]" here, but I would be interested in seeing a source for this. Does anyone know of one?
A few words on Doug Engelbart
11–20 of 59 posts
Re: A few words on Doug Engelbart
#12This is a bit needlessly aggressive.
Re: A few words on Doug Engelbart
#13This is a bit needlessly aggressive.
Re: A few words on Doug Engelbart
#14I found that the quip about how the document that they are sharing while having a conversation is not screensharing as we commonly understand it in modern parlance to be pretty illuminating. That modern screensharing is in several ways worse than a demo that came out decades ago is frankly amazing. I've tried to recapture a bit of that early magic with https://coderpad.io/ (multiple cursors, realtime editing/executio…
It really is amazing. I feel like there is a similar mismatch and almost backwards progress when you look at the concepts and tools behind smalltalk and the concepts most working programmers today reason with and are familiar with.
Re: A few words on Doug Engelbart
#15http://phdtree.org/scholar/engelbart-douglas-carl/
but there is no where to find out info about his PhD advisor.
Re: A few words on Doug Engelbart
#16That was a fucking excellent eulogy.
Re: A few words on Doug Engelbart
#17Anyone knows who was Doug Engelbart's PhD advisor at Berkeley? We have his profile at phdtree: http://phdtree.org/scholar/engelbart-douglas-carl/ but there is no where to find out info about his PhD advisor.
http://www-sul.stanford.edu/depts/hasrg/histsci/ssvoral/enge...
More:
http://www.ee.washington.edu/people/alumni/profiles/woodyard...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Robert_Woodyard
Its also listed on his wiki page directly.
Re: A few words on Doug Engelbart
#18It's screen sharing where each person has their own cursor. Works surprisingly well for a small company product.
Re: A few words on Doug Engelbart
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
It really is amazing. I feel like there is a similar mismatch and almost backwards progress when you look at the concepts and tools behind smalltalk and the concepts most working programmers today reason with and are familiar with.
I think the huge focus on web development set CS back at least two decades in certain areas. The industry has been so intent on reinventing applications through the browser, it's lost ground in what can happen in areas like Engelbert's or Smalltalk or real hypertext.
Re: A few words on Doug Engelbart
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
It really is amazing. I feel like there is a similar mismatch and almost backwards progress when you look at the concepts and tools behind smalltalk and the concepts most working programmers today reason with and are familiar with.
I think the huge focus on web development set CS back at least two decades in certain areas. The industry has been so intent on reinventing applications through the browser, it's lost ground in what can happen in areas like Engelbert's or Smalltalk or real hypertext.