Murdoch made a mistake sending Jobs that first clarifying email. HC shows a lack of any coherent direction having one junior person send a response, and then a senior person follow up with more exposition. The moment Murdoch does this, the dynamic is flipped, and HC is chasing after Apple. Jobs's strategy is to jump all over this and make the argument clear: here's what we're offering, here's why it's good for you, h…
* (I’d appreciate it if we can keep this between you and me)
* Maybe I’m missing something, but I don’t see any other alternatives. Do you?