Live data from Hacker News

I Don't Want Your Fucking App

idontwantyourfuckingapp.tumblr.com

171–180 of 270 posts

Re: I Don't Want Your Fucking App

#171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apps will give you a few more obscure datapoints that web analytics won't but I'll bet that very few companies actually use them. I doubt many even study bounce rates when they present you with these app download modals.

By "obscure datapoints" are you referring to my contact list and geolocation? Apps can gain access to all sorts of information inaccessible to the browser.

Most mobile browsers on the platforms getting these popups expose a geolocation API.

Re: I Don't Want Your Fucking App

#173
That goes for any modal, anywhere in the app (mobile or not) unless it's absolutely necessary. Subscribe to your newsletter? Fuck you. Ads? Double fuck you. Pointless promotional modals. Triple fuck you.

A dialog box should be modal only when it cannot be otherwise. Even then, if I can't click/tap out of it and I have to hit your stupid little 'X' that's somewhere on some layer of the god-awful shit you just wasted money developing so you can throw it in my face (especially on paid sites, aka banks) do yourself a favor and terminate whomever is working on your app. Likely that would be thyself.

Re: I Don't Want Your Fucking App

#175
post #31

How about we drop the prudishness, and discuss the points raised by the article? Seriously, what's with all the language moralising? This guys is totally free to make his points colourfully and passionately however he wants to. If it upsets you so much (it really shouldn't) then don't read it. His word choices are not hate speech or discriminatory so the fact that they may offend your sensibilities has precisely zero…

(I'm the creator of the site) I've noticed - and I may be wrong - that all the folk in the UK are unfazed by the swearing and have reacted quite positively either in person or on Twitter. The Americans, by contrast, seem a lot more upset about the swearing. I wonder why that is? Either way, I do wonder if some sections of the tech community are to... corporate in their approach to language. Look at the fuss when Linu…

I didn't like the swearing, but for different reasons - it was just annoying/tiring to read "fucking" (or some variation) every fourth or fifth word. This is similar to some people finishing every sentence with "you know". Just a nitpick, that's all.

I agree with the content though.

Re: I Don't Want Your Fucking App

#176
I feel the same way about onswipe. At a time where mobile devices have ultra-high screen resolutions and very fancy zooming features, I find the use (shoving into our eyes) of onswipe by many websites to be disruptive and annoying. I usually don't bother the moment I see the spinning wheel. Swipe right to left, paginated content, larger fonts (less content), hard to scan content... it breaks the whole internet experience. I know how to browse, I know how to read web pages, thank you, please give me my web page or gtfo. .

.. Maybe wrong thread?

Re: I Don't Want Your Fucking App

#177
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(I'm the creator of the site) I've noticed - and I may be wrong - that all the folk in the UK are unfazed by the swearing and have reacted quite positively either in person or on Twitter. The Americans, by contrast, seem a lot more upset about the swearing. I wonder why that is? Either way, I do wonder if some sections of the tech community are to... corporate in their approach to language. Look at the fuss when Linu…

The Americans, by contrast, seem a lot more upset about the swearing. I wonder why that is? There's a prudish streak in the US that I really believe comes from the fact that the country was originally settled by people too religious and too concerned with overtly moral social interaction to be tolerated in 17th century England. That may seem like too easy an explanation but I really do think there is some truth to it…

Yah, well fuck you and your stupid piece of shit POV on why Americans have a folk up their ass.

The English aren't exactly swinging naked from the trees now are they? Every freaking day in France some man or woman is letting it ALL hang out, having a public chat with poor little children around no less, and nobody gives a shit!

Hah, hah, Anglophones are prudish in general, although we probably take the cake in the States.

Re: I Don't Want Your Fucking App

#178
Lots of people follow the newest trend. The same thing happened with the web in the early days. Everybody (person, company, entity) wanted a website. They didn't know why, who would use it and what for, but they said all their clients/customers/friends were asking for it. The same thing is happening now with mobile.

As time progresses, people will get a better understanding of who uses mobile, when and for what and will adapt development of mobile apps accordingly.

Re: I Don't Want Your Fucking App

#180
post #46

So much this. When I come to your site it is very unlikely I'm looking for any sort of long term relationship. What I want is access to the information I'm looking for as quickly and painlessly as possible. Secondly, your app probably wants various permissions on my system. No. Third, why the hell would I want hundreds of apps grunking up my menus? Fourth, you already have my whole screen, what more do you want? So y…

I agree with all points. What I'm wondering is, what percentage of mobile users are like me, you and almost everyone that commented here? Does the proverbial "average user" share the sentiment? My guess is no, or else the marketroids that push the app agenda would have gotten the message by now.

I don't think marketroids care about reality based things like data -- the good ones does, but not the kind that is employed by the daily mail.

The daily mail is actually better because they _explicitly_ wrote "you wont see this again for 7 days", which is insane, since if I didn't want it the first time I don't want it the second time.

As for quora, well they are run by people who wants to make the world a worse place to be, so no surprise there.

Post reply on HN