Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

BitTorrent’s Secure Dropbox Alternative Goes Public

torrentfreak.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

231–240 of 291 posts

Re: BitTorrent’s Secure Dropbox Alternative Goes Public

#231

Post by mikestew »

uses wrote: post #213
mikestew wrote: post #158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you already have a Synology box, what do you get with BS versus using Synology's own CloudStation? I've looked into BS, but I guess I'm not getting what I gain running it on my DS410.

I've never used CloudStation, but with respect to BitTorrent Sync, the DiskStation would be just another device that syncs the files. So the main benefit is that it acts as another backup / seeder for your private p2p network.

Ah, thanks. With CloudStation, the Synology is a central box to which all devices sync, as opposed to the p2p nature of BS.

Re: BitTorrent’s Secure Dropbox Alternative Goes Public

#232

Post by nodata »

nostromo wrote: post #83
buro9 wrote: post #9

Really nice, but the thing is... Dropbox has gone beyond just file sharing. One example: I used to use Flickr for photo sharing, but cameras got better, images got bigger, and I have a lot of photos. I moved from Flickr to Picasa as it could cope with the directories full of photos and I didn't have to manually upload them and Google's storage space was cheaper. Then I ran out of space... over 100GB of photos, where…

Sharing photos was solved for the 99% by Facebook & Apple & Google. If you're a photographer with gobs of high resolution photos Dropbox is perfect for you, but I imagine that is a niche pain point. What is a much bigger opportunity is a way that easily lets groups share music and movies. This cannot be solved by a centralized service like Dropbox for legal reasons. This is what would concern me if I was Dropbox; BTS…

> Sharing photos was solved for the 99% by Facebook & Apple & Google.

Rubbish. Dropbox already has people's photos. It's easier and better to tap the screen a few times and share them there.

Re: BitTorrent’s Secure Dropbox Alternative Goes Public

#233

Post by e12e »

pm90 wrote: post #186
javanix wrote: post #178

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is Steam actually using BitTorrent? I thought they were using something proprietary. If they are not using BitTorrent then Sync would provide a new, plausible way to stop ISPs from blocking that specific protocol.

I remember that Ubuntu used to be available via torrents

Still is? http://www.ubuntu.com/download/desktop/alternative-downloads

There's also http://debtorrent.alioth.debian.org/

Apparently CCP is planning to use bittorrent for the next generation launcher for EVE online:

http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/74573

Re: BitTorrent’s Secure Dropbox Alternative Goes Public

#234

Post by dombili »

urza wrote: post #136
te_chris wrote: post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Would totally buy something like that that worked out of the box.

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/transporterguy/transport...

Works globally, only ships within the US. That's awesome.

Re: BitTorrent’s Secure Dropbox Alternative Goes Public

#235

Post by neolefty »

nessus42 wrote: post #176
k2enemy wrote: post #98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> And consumers are not thinking in terms of encrypted sync, they're just thinking in terms of "I just want to do X, why is it so hard", and so I can't see this (very nice) solution really solving the problems that consumers have, that will make them prioritise security. I have a use case that is pretty common among my peer group and BT Sync has been the best solution I've been able to find. In a nutshell, I need to…

For the reasons that you've specified and others, I rolled my own very simple sync system based on Git. The biggest problem I personally have with Dropbbox et. al, is that none of the commercial solutions sync symbolic links opaquely . ("Opaque" syncing of symlinks means to sync the links themselves and not what the symlinks link to.) I use symlinks heavily and so I absolutely require this feature. Most of the commer…

Sounds like it's time for a "design pattern" or "best practice" -- that is, covering up for a tool's faults.

What if you treat DropBox as a raw, strict hierarchical store and never use it directly, but only link into it from elsewhere? Move all the links outside of it.

    ln ~/Dropbox/photos ~/Photos
    ln ~/Dropbox/family/baby/cute-movies ~/Photos/baby-cute-movies
etc.

Re: BitTorrent’s Secure Dropbox Alternative Goes Public

#237

Post by bad_user »

NicoJuicy wrote: post #225
ebtalley wrote: post #157

Earlier quoted context omitted.

this was all well and good to me until I saw that Google shut down someones account for violation of TOS. Im already mulling over alternatives. This might be one of them.

He had a spreadsheet with passwords and usernames of his client (they were a lot of them). Automation of Google's algorithm thought he was a hacker, they fixed it and he got his account back. You should have read the whole story ;-)

So why is Google looking inside the uploaded files, if the files aren't public? If the guy was a "hacker", so freaking what?

Re: BitTorrent’s Secure Dropbox Alternative Goes Public

#239

Post by jos3000 »

aninhumer wrote: post #193
nessus42 wrote: post #176

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For the reasons that you've specified and others, I rolled my own very simple sync system based on Git. The biggest problem I personally have with Dropbbox et. al, is that none of the commercial solutions sync symbolic links opaquely . ("Opaque" syncing of symlinks means to sync the links themselves and not what the symlinks link to.) I use symlinks heavily and so I absolutely require this feature. Most of the commer…

What does Dropbox do in the case of a symlink circular reference?

I can answer this question since I accidentally created a circular reference the other day. It starts syncing the recursive structure until it runs out of quota.

Re: BitTorrent’s Secure Dropbox Alternative Goes Public

#240

Post by zurn »

manishsharan wrote: post #20
buro9 wrote: post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're probably right... the bittorrent speciality. I guess the marketing is to provide them with a nice level of deniability. It's not a Dropbox competitor, it's just encrypted folder sharing.

I would respectfully disagree with what you seem to be implying. This service would mostly be used by us who are wary about trusting Google/Microsoft/Dropbox and the judgement of their automated decision systems with our life . Yesterday there was a HN story about a guy who got kicked off Google Docs because an automated program was trolling/mining through their users files and its judgement was not to be questioned…

Also there was a SkyDrive user who got all his MS stuff linked to the account nuked because he had taken half nude photos of someone with his phone and put them in his private folder in SkyDrive.

http://wmpoweruser.com/watch-what-you-store-on-skydriveyou-m...

Post reply on HN