Live data from Hacker News

Lulu: An App No One Should Accept

compylr.com

151–160 of 356 posts

Re: Lulu: An App No One Should Accept

#152
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I am seriously asking - Where are all the feminists now? Especially the ones who know this app.. Don't worry, they are certainly ready with the argument that it is the "patriarchy" that makes this app acceptable but not the reverse.

As I said to the previous poster, if you have a shred of evidence that "the feminists" consider this app to be acceptable (not just "less bad"), you should share it now. If you don't, then you might want to pause for a few minutes and seriously ask yourself why you said what you did. Because from my experience, opposing a service like this is a core value of feminism. (It may not be seen as a top priority, but that's…

I think you and duaneb have misunderstood my comment. I do not mean that they will say that it is acceptable to them because of the patriarchy, they will say that it is acceptable to society because of the patriarchy. In other words, they will blame the existence and acceptance of this app on the patriarchy and not the individuals who created it and accept it.

Re: Lulu: An App No One Should Accept

#153
post #25

Wow, it's like everything that I used to fear about the dating world put into one shiny app. Had this been out years ago when I was single, it would've definitely given me a lot of anxiety. Having been happily married for 5 years, all I can say to single folks is that if someone actively rates people on apps/sites like this, they are most likely not the kind of people you want to be with in the long run. As for the s…

Not to mention, female privilege lets them call men "creepers" or "perverts" without question. I've pressed female friends about this and they just answer with "I didnt like the look he gave me" or "we just didnt click."

So instead of understanding that most people are not compatible, we're now building a db to slander them based on purely emotional reasoning?

If women are using this then it says a lot about the woman. I imagine the women drawn to this are difficult anyway. This problem kind of solves itself. I doubt this app can help them and its a symptom of a very negative attitude toward dating and, frankly, socially acceptable misandry.

Re: Lulu: An App No One Should Accept

#154
post #143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're not thinking like an entrepreneur. That just means that prison rape victims are an untapped* market. *badoom, pish!

I find it absolutely despicable to make light of violent abuse, including sexual abuse, in prison. We should be doing all we can to make our prisons safer for everyone. The fact that many people think it is OK to make and laugh at prison rape jokes sickens me. What would you think if I made rape jokes about your 90 year old grandma? Or your ten year old son? Or your wife? If that is not ok, neither is prison rape of…

This being said, I would like to point out that I also made light of violent, sexual abuse in prison in the grandparent post - I deserve the downvotes too.

Re: Lulu: An App No One Should Accept

#155
They have the ability to remove a Facebook account from their system permanently. Email them asking to be removed and they will add you to the blocked list so that no one can rate/review you and you do not appear on the network in any way.

Re: Lulu: An App No One Should Accept

#156
post #11

In recent times I've gotten the impression that their is a double standard going on regarding certain (not all) services and events that are only targeted to women. If this had been an app for men rating and alerting them about certain women all hell would of broke loose.

Nah, it just probably wouldn't have been funded.

Re: Lulu: An App No One Should Accept

#158
post #69

Where are all the feminists now? This is the perfect example of double-standards implied by women. Imagine an alternative scenario where men could rate their female counterparts on the basis of their 'assets' as defined by some vague methodology. Imagine how much fire under men would be, with ALL men being broadly labelled as sexists because this app was targeted at men. I am seriously asking - Where are all the femi…

First of all, there is no such thing as feminists in the way you imply: it is category, not a strict set of beliefs. Some types of feminism endorse this sort of thing, because they are sex positive - they would be ok with any app that allows the ranking of people in sex terms, some would have a problem with this app because it doesn't include women rankings. Some would have a problem with a men ranking women app but not this one, because when you go down to the local bar (in most places) you can hear men loudly talking about what women are sluts and which are sweet girls, and if how to get them, but women having those conversations are loudly labeled snobby or bitches - so it evens out the labeling.

Basically I'm saying, you're trying to set fire to a strawman.

Re: Lulu: An App No One Should Accept

#159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ah, so apparently guys are still good enough to hire. Interesting. Care to share your experiences on what it was like to work there?

While I was there, we were building a social network for women, something between Path and Facebook where they could share their day-to-day with their closest friends. The rating thing was sort of an afterthought, I guess they pivoted. There wasn't really a guy-hating culture, in fact, most of the employees there were men. I don't know how it's changed since.

Hopefully we still have a few good men on the inside.

Re: Lulu: An App No One Should Accept

#160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As the former CTO of that company, I really doubt this. When I was there, the app was built on Django, and I left some pretty competent people behind, so I'm quite sure they wouldn't have made a mistake so rudimentary. However, I don't know what happened after I left, so there might have been some dubious decisions.

It was a joke BTW ;)

A failed attempt.
Post reply on HN