71–80 of 415 posts
What's the difference between "php" and "php-raw" in some of the data? Maybe I'm still in my morning fog, but having trouble thinking of what "php-raw" might mean. Sigh.
I am completely stunned by the performance cost of using ORM/AR, and will be using this to shame our team lead into giving it up and going for raw queries.
What's the difference between "php" and "php-raw" in some of the data? Maybe I'm still in my morning fog, but having trouble thinking of what "php-raw" might mean. Sigh.
The code says php-raw refers to using PDO (which all project should be using) vs using an ORM or ActiveRecord. I am completely stunned by the performance cost of using ORM/AR, and will be using this to shame our team lead into giving it up and going for raw queries.
What's the difference between "php" and "php-raw" in some of the data? Maybe I'm still in my morning fog, but having trouble thinking of what "php-raw" might mean. Sigh.
Would love to see how these results compare to some of the web frameworks for concurrent functional languages like Erlang/Haskell: Nitrogen, Chicago Boss, Snap, Yesod, etc.
What's the difference between "php" and "php-raw" in some of the data? Maybe I'm still in my morning fog, but having trouble thinking of what "php-raw" might mean. Sigh.
php - https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/blob/mast...
php-raw - https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/blob/mast...
For "php", they used an ORM. For php-raw they used the stdlib (pdo).
I'd like to see how .Net MVC would compare. I realize you'd have to spin it up on a Windows EC2 instance and there would definitely be some variance in the performance of that box vs. the nix EC2 instances but I'd still be interested in seeing how it fares in comparison.
We agree. We aim to provide a .NET MVC test soon. We did briefly test that on our i7 hardware and if memory serves me correctly, it clocked in at around the position as Spring. But don't quote me on that! :)
One of the most interesting things this comparison brings out to me is not so much the differences between the various frameworks (although the differences between options on the same platform is definitely very useful information), but also the issue that few of us seem to think about these days: the cost of any of the frameworks above the bare standard library of the platform its hosted on. Theres a consistant, con…
I'd love to see your framework optimization index. Honestly, all of this would be a wonderful thing to automate and put in a web app - a readily-accessible, up-to-date measure of the current performance of the state of the art in languages and frameworks. I bet it would really change some of the technology choices made.
Framework Framework Index
Gemini 87.88
Vert.x 76.29
Express 68.85
Sinatra-Ruby 67.88
WebGo 51.08
Compojure 45.69
Rails-Ruby 31.75
Wicket 29.33
Rails-Jruby 20.09
Play 18.02
Sinatra-Jruby 15.96
Tapestry 13.57
Spring 13.48
Grails 7.11
Cake 1.17
Cake was an interesting choice for a PHP framework to test. I wonder why they didn't choose Symfony, which is arguably the leading PHP framework.
I'd also like to see a "light" framework meant for building APIs, like Slim, for instance.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Per my experience, CakePHP is probably one of the slowest PHP frameworks. It has a large overhead and lots of legacy code that slows down the whole system. Generally, frameworks targeted at PHP 5.3+ are faster. PHP 5.4 has further performance boost in production and PHP 5.5 has Zend Optimizer built-in, which suppose to further speed up but I have never try that in production.
We have Zend in mind as the next PHP framework we'd like to include in the tests.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'd be interested to know this as well. I can understand time constraints in compiling these kind of comparisons, but as I'm about to embark on a web project in Go, I'd be interested to know if there was any technical constraints that prevented benchmarking Go.
We recognize that deficiency and we do aim to add database tests for Go. If you could quickly draft that up and submit a pull request, we'd love to add it.