I would love to contribute a code for a specific PHP framework: Silex. Do you have requirements you'd like to hit?
Web Framework Benchmarks
61–70 of 415 posts
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks
#62Re: Web Framework Benchmarks
#63One of the most interesting things this comparison brings out to me is not so much the differences between the various frameworks (although the differences between options on the same platform is definitely very useful information), but also the issue that few of us seem to think about these days: the cost of any of the frameworks above the bare standard library of the platform its hosted on. Theres a consistant, con…
I think this is a much needed and excellent point to make. Just take a look at how Go dips down when using Webgo.
Also, They used Go 1.0.3... I hope they update to 1.1 next month. Most everyone using Go for intensive production uses is using Go tip (which is the branch due to become 1.1 RC next month)
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks
#64How about Lift? Btw, the play framework you tested is Java or Scala based? Either way, I'm shocked to see Play perform so slow comparatively. Although it's easily 10x faster than rails on most tests, I'm shocked to see Node.js faster than Play! (by 2x in most cases) Wow!! Maybe Node.js critics should start appreciating it after all..
Disclaimer: I am a colleague of the author of the linked article.
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks
#65(The big four in my book are: ASP.Net MVC, Rails, Django and CakePHP)
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks
#66There is a huge difference between raw PHP and CakePHP. I'd be curious to see other PHP frameworks (such as Zend, or Slim) in there-- is Cake just particularly slow, or is that simply what happens when you have a PHP framework?
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks
#67It would be very interesting to see OpenResty (Nginx + Lua) in there, since it's so different from other approaches.
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks
#68If you seriously thought that the difference between a netty and django would be 4 times then you simply don't understand what these frameworks do in the first place.
I would have guessed something like less than 100 times slower and that would have been still fine since the cost of all kinds of latencies in the system usually far outweigh the speed of the framework itself.
Re: Web Framework Benchmarks
#69Why are there no Go results for the DB access benchmarks?
I'd be interested to know this as well. I can understand time constraints in compiling these kind of comparisons, but as I'm about to embark on a web project in Go, I'd be interested to know if there was any technical constraints that prevented benchmarking Go.