Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're looking at the cost of production, and then the price and assuming that all of the space between the two is profit, and seem to be implying that somehow it is a ripoff. What you're not considering is the value to the customer. The incremental cost of a copy of Microsoft Office (with electronic delivery they cut out virtually all of their manufacturing cost) is close to zero. Probably 12p as well. Yet Microsoft…
Ketchup is a physical product with raw material costs which requires physical storage and delivery, and must be distributed through intermediaries. It also has a shelf life, and ingredients that fluctuate in price seasonally. Your comparison is about as sensical as me complaining I can't type an essay using 100 bottles of ketchup. However, my points are that a) we routinely pay 10x the 'value' of food products, and b…
How much a person will pay for something determines its "value" to them. If a person will pay $10 for a bottle of ketchup, then it doesn't matter what the production cost was, the value they received was at least $10.