111–120 of 374 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, that what's I was describing. It works just fine. When I tab back to Sublime, I get the " has changed on disk. Do you want to reload it?" modal dialog box. (If there are no unsaved changes in the Sublime buffer that could be clobbered, it just reloads the file silently as you'd expect.)
It didn't work when I tried a few weeks ago. I am running on Linux.
> OSX: 10.7 or later is required Looks like I might have to bite the upgrade bullet this year.
I'm a Sublime Text 2 owner, but the continued lack of a Linux/ARM build nor any announced plans for the same mean I won't be upgrading. It is a shame because I like the editor a lot, but if it doesn't work on all the platforms I use it ultimately has zero value to me.
Damn! There goes the whole of the Linux/ARM community!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The other advantage is having the same text editor on Windows, OS X and Linux. No more wishing you had TextMate in Windows, or Notepad++ in OS X.
Umm.. vim works fine on all platforms.
A ssh/text-only version of sublime text would be interesting ;)
"API: Upgraded from Python 2.6 to Python 3.3" Oh god, I've got some plugin fixing to do..
Case in point, right off the bat.. Package Control's print statements are going to have to go and urllib2 was deprecated. :)
> The price for a Sublime Text license key has increased by $11 to $70, the first price rise in Sublime Text’s five year history That's a pretty big jump. Not saying it's not worth it.
Although it's a silly error, I made the same one, and I know that I bought ST for $59. So I think the problem here is with the wording, not with us.
Is it just me or Package Control doesn't work on it?
I'm a Sublime Text 2 owner, but the continued lack of a Linux/ARM build nor any announced plans for the same mean I won't be upgrading. It is a shame because I like the editor a lot, but if it doesn't work on all the platforms I use it ultimately has zero value to me.
> I'm a Sublime Text 2 owner, but the continued lack of a Linux/ARM build nor any announced plans for the same mean I won't be upgrading. Damn! There goes the whole of the Linux/ARM community!
ARM devices are happening.. without having seen your codebase I can't speak for how hard it'd be to build for a new target, but given that you're targeting win32 and posixy systems already it seems achievable.
Wouldn't you much rather be the badass that works everywhere than snrk at a growing niche?