Mac is Linux done right
11–20 of 43 posts
Re: Mac is Linux done right
#12Also, someone should tell the author Mac is not Linux.
Re: Mac is Linux done right
#13Well, I've tried developing on a mac and deploying to linux. Never again.
Re: Mac is Linux done right
#14Re: Mac is Linux done right
#15"Linux"? If only there were some name you could call all those systems with shells and things. (And within that spectrum, from a all-over system perspective, i.e. not just GUI frippery, I'd rate OS X at about the same level as HP/UX. Maybe.)
The only bad things about OS X are due to the proprietary and closed nature of some of the components (and the older versions used for some unix userland stuff). Implementation and experience wise, the whole desktop is miles ahead of Gnome/KDE.
Even Miguel De Icaza agrees, and he's the one of the handful who bloody started "Desktop Linux".
Re: Mac is Linux done right
#16"Linux"? If only there were some name you could call all those systems with shells and things. (And within that spectrum, from a all-over system perspective, i.e. not just GUI frippery, I'd rate OS X at about the same level as HP/UX. Maybe.)
Re: Mac is Linux done right
#17I've a decade-long linux user and am forced to use OSX on a daily basis due to iOS app dev. And OSX needs some real improvement coming from a Linux perspective. Here's why.
Window management (If you used Compiz not for its effect but window management, you'll understand why) suck. Dual screen sucks. Try expanding one to a different viewport and you can't use the other screen. I haven't tried 3 screens yet. Need more configurability and better CLI integration. (IE: Try the command to start Postgres, as is compared to ubuntu's service manner)
I'm a dev though.
Re: Mac is Linux done right
#18Well, I've tried developing on a mac and deploying to linux. Never again.
+bazillion. When I used Mac OS X, everything was very shiny, but also not fully there, functionally. You almost had everything you need, but those few packages that needed to be manually built. And that setting was almost reasonable, but not quite. And there was always something that could be worked around, but never get solved. So yes, I could run MS Word without resorting to Wine, but I couldn't get any work done w…
Apart from development being a complete pain, the UI was designed for casual users. The virtual desktop implementation switched desktops on alt+tab, rendering desktops completely useless for separation of activities. There were many such small annoyances, and I was thoroughly glad to switch to Ubuntu in the end.
Re: Mac is Linux done right
#19> Interesting new ones are: lsm, lam, asr. asr aside, I have lam(1) but no lsm. Is it native to OS X or can you borrow it somewhere?
I had it installed with my Mac, can’t sure if it’s native or comes with Xcode command line tools.
Maxims-MacBook-Air:~ maximveksler$ which lsm /usr/bin/lsm
Re: Mac is Linux done right
#20"Linux done right", depending on your definition, but certainly not GNU/Linux done right. You know, seeing as 90% the OS is proprietary.