Live data from Hacker News

iPad Hack Statement Of Responsibility

techcrunch.com

1–10 of 119 posts

Re: iPad Hack Statement Of Responsibility

#3
I wasn't sure whether this is a spoof or not. Is he serious when he writes - "I did this because I despised people I think are unjustly wealthy and wanted to embarass them. "

That was his admitted rationale - that he was seeking to embarrass people he despised because they were "unjustly wealthy?"

Re: iPad Hack Statement Of Responsibility

#4
When you hear of horrible stores like that of Aaron Swartz and the author of this insightful article Andrew Auernheimer it really paints a picture of just how afraid the US government is of the Internet. People lament China for their great firewall and control over its people and yet the US is starting to look more and more like China everyday. This is how revolts against governments start, absurd laws and persecution of innocent people which eventually pushes people over the edge and if they don't kill themselves they uprise and society gets thrown into disarray which only results in more oppressive laws and absurd persecution, it's a horrible cycle.

All this guy did was exploit publicly available information. It seems the US is now sending people to jail for pointing out other peoples stupidity. Sure he probably went too far with the whole, "I want to embarrass AT&T thing" but trolling is not hacking and it's not like Andrew had to bypass any form of security to get the info in the first place.

Anyone would swear this guy found a way to steal credit card details...

Re: iPad Hack Statement Of Responsibility

#5
If anyone thinks weev deserves any sympathy, you don't know the full story. weev had malicious intent and wanted to harm AT&T by exposing users data. Instead of doing anything remotely rational he took all the data and wanted to sell it.

Laws take into account indent (mens rea) and there is a lot of evidence in his indictment that he wanted to profit off this act. He shouldn't be compared to Aaron Swartz

Re: iPad Hack Statement Of Responsibility

#6
From Wikipedia:

"On 20 November 2012, Auernheimer was found guilty of one count of identity fraud and one count of conspiracy to access a computer without authorization. Auernheimer tweeted that he would appeal the ruling."

Is the problem that the laws themselves are terrible, or that the laws are being misused by overzealous prosecutors? I mean, if changing a public URL is considered "conspiracy to access a computer without authorization"... Or is this just not the full story, and he really was trying to do some "bad" stuff?

But if not: what can be done to change the law? Is appearing "soft on hacking" such a bad idea that politicians just won't support something better? Or is it really difficult to craft laws that actually do criminalize "bad" activity, without also technically criminalizing innocent activity?

What can be done?

Re: iPad Hack Statement Of Responsibility

#9
post #5

If anyone thinks weev deserves any sympathy, you don't know the full story. weev had malicious intent and wanted to harm AT&T by exposing users data. Instead of doing anything remotely rational he took all the data and wanted to sell it. Laws take into account indent (mens rea) and there is a lot of evidence in his indictment that he wanted to profit off this act. He shouldn't be compared to Aaron Swartz

More information about the case from ars technica, that supports your story

http://arstechnica.com/apple/2011/01/goatse-security-trolls-...

Re: iPad Hack Statement Of Responsibility

#10

When you hear of horrible stores like that of Aaron Swartz and the author of this insightful article Andrew Auernheimer it really paints a picture of just how afraid the US government is of the Internet. People lament China for their great firewall and control over its people and yet the US is starting to look more and more like China everyday. This is how revolts against governments start, absurd laws and persecutio…

China is not naturally terrible, China is just in that kind of shithole phase which any country might get into. It's the wrong direction a civilization evolves into.
Post reply on HN