iPad Hack Statement Of Responsibility
techcrunch.com
iPad Hack Statement Of Responsibility
1–10 of 119 posts
Re: iPad Hack Statement Of Responsibility
#2Re: iPad Hack Statement Of Responsibility
#3That was his admitted rationale - that he was seeking to embarrass people he despised because they were "unjustly wealthy?"
Re: iPad Hack Statement Of Responsibility
#4All this guy did was exploit publicly available information. It seems the US is now sending people to jail for pointing out other peoples stupidity. Sure he probably went too far with the whole, "I want to embarrass AT&T thing" but trolling is not hacking and it's not like Andrew had to bypass any form of security to get the info in the first place.
Anyone would swear this guy found a way to steal credit card details...
Re: iPad Hack Statement Of Responsibility
#5Laws take into account indent (mens rea) and there is a lot of evidence in his indictment that he wanted to profit off this act. He shouldn't be compared to Aaron Swartz
Re: iPad Hack Statement Of Responsibility
#6"On 20 November 2012, Auernheimer was found guilty of one count of identity fraud and one count of conspiracy to access a computer without authorization. Auernheimer tweeted that he would appeal the ruling."
Is the problem that the laws themselves are terrible, or that the laws are being misused by overzealous prosecutors? I mean, if changing a public URL is considered "conspiracy to access a computer without authorization"... Or is this just not the full story, and he really was trying to do some "bad" stuff?
But if not: what can be done to change the law? Is appearing "soft on hacking" such a bad idea that politicians just won't support something better? Or is it really difficult to craft laws that actually do criminalize "bad" activity, without also technically criminalizing innocent activity?
What can be done?
Re: iPad Hack Statement Of Responsibility
#7Pardon my language, but what the fuck happened to this country.
Re: iPad Hack Statement Of Responsibility
#8Re: iPad Hack Statement Of Responsibility
#9If anyone thinks weev deserves any sympathy, you don't know the full story. weev had malicious intent and wanted to harm AT&T by exposing users data. Instead of doing anything remotely rational he took all the data and wanted to sell it. Laws take into account indent (mens rea) and there is a lot of evidence in his indictment that he wanted to profit off this act. He shouldn't be compared to Aaron Swartz
http://arstechnica.com/apple/2011/01/goatse-security-trolls-...
Re: iPad Hack Statement Of Responsibility
#10When you hear of horrible stores like that of Aaron Swartz and the author of this insightful article Andrew Auernheimer it really paints a picture of just how afraid the US government is of the Internet. People lament China for their great firewall and control over its people and yet the US is starting to look more and more like China everyday. This is how revolts against governments start, absurd laws and persecutio…