Live data from Hacker News

IBM's Watson Memorized 'Urban Dictionary,' Then His Overlords Had to Delete It

theatlantic.com

141–150 of 163 posts

Re: IBM's Watson Memorized 'Urban Dictionary,' Then His Overlords Had to Delete It

#141
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Could someone explain the Ray Kurzweil hate to me? Predicting the future is hard.

For me it's the smug "See, I told you cell phones would be important in the future" gloating over obvious predictions, and the "well I said we would all be using driverless cars but since there is one, that still validates my entire prediction" hedging. Also his whole "I'm going to eat magic vitamins that will keep me alive forever" thing.

Not wanting to die is a mainstream mindset.

Re: IBM's Watson Memorized 'Urban Dictionary,' Then His Overlords Had to Delete It

#142
post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or as a culture. It seems to me that the gap between what language is acceptable in informal vs formal settings is fairly large in the US, while in other countries, using words like 'bullshit' in more formal settings is less taboo. Wonder if there's any research on this.

I've worked at some VERY major US companies, and there was generally no hesitance to throw around significant profanity in engineering department meetings, that's for sure!

I am not sure if engineering meetings count as a formal setting though. :)

Re: IBM's Watson Memorized 'Urban Dictionary,' Then His Overlords Had to Delete It

#143
post #59

What an interesting reflection on who we are as a species. We build systems to organize who we are (urbandictionary) but hate it when the systems use that information tell us who we are (watson). It feels so much like the emperor isn't wearing any clothes. Perhaps an appropriate response would be for the computer to measure the tension in the human voice response to it's queries and optimize for lower tension. So it…

I have to disagree. I'm not an "angel" by any means, but any time I visit Urban Dictionary, I come away feeling filthy. I typically go there to look up some abbreviation I heard on reddit or IRC or a blog post somewhere and what I look up usually ends up being middling-dirty, but the stuff that I see there "on my way" to the word I'm looking for makes me cringe and gives me a bleak vision of what the next generation…

People are always quick to pull a small subset of data to brand the younger generation as failures. It happens all through the ages: drugged up hippies, punk rockers, pill popping clubbers, internet trolls....

Yet the younger generations are growing up, getting degrees, decent jobs and generally giving the old guard a run for their money.

Re: IBM's Watson Memorized 'Urban Dictionary,' Then His Overlords Had to Delete It

#144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Techie jargon is generally meant to enhance communication, while biz jargon is meant to baffle the listener with bullshit. Huge difference.

Want to come build a distributed social cloud web app with me using node? The real problem is when the meaning of a word or phrase becomes so broad that it conveys no information, or gets swamped by overuse and becomes a buzzword.

Let's see, social doesn't mean anything, and cloud is just a word for distributed, so let's cut that down. Also it's not fair to mix the name of a product as if it's a tech 'term' so let's take that out too.

> distributed web-app

Yeah that sounds way better than any marketing-speak sentence.

Re: IBM's Watson Memorized 'Urban Dictionary,' Then His Overlords Had to Delete It

#145

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have to disagree. I'm not an "angel" by any means, but any time I visit Urban Dictionary, I come away feeling filthy. I typically go there to look up some abbreviation I heard on reddit or IRC or a blog post somewhere and what I look up usually ends up being middling-dirty, but the stuff that I see there "on my way" to the word I'm looking for makes me cringe and gives me a bleak vision of what the next generation…

What are you disagreeing with? It sounds like you're demonstrating the point: You find it distasteful to be told a bunch of stuff that was already true.

The point is that the urban dictionary is full of bullshit joke/shock-value definitions that are basically not used. To call it as a whole 'true' is rather misleading.

Re: IBM's Watson Memorized 'Urban Dictionary,' Then His Overlords Had to Delete It

#146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apparently so: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=roflstomp

The meaning of roflstomp seems obvious enough... but how to pronounce it... (rhyming with "waffle stomp"?)

I've heard it pronounced as rhyming with woeful-stomp.

Re: IBM's Watson Memorized 'Urban Dictionary,' Then His Overlords Had to Delete It

#147
post #113
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Depends how you define upload. Why couldn't a computer just simulate a persons outputs based on recordings of their life. Does virtualization of life really need to have consistent consciousness? Maybe rip would be a better word than upload.

Continuity of consciousness is a fascinating problem to contemplate. To Be: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdxucpPq6Lc See also the Grandfather's Axe paradox, aka Ship of Theseus: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship_of_Theseus A longer piece, Mechanisms of Mind Transfer: http://www.mind.ilstu.edu/curriculum/extraordinary_future/Ph...

"To be" assumes that 1) it is possible to extract the information non-destructively, and 2) that it is possible to extract the information at all. The closer the measurement, the more you measure the interaction between the measuring instrument and the observed phenomenon, rather than the phenomenon itself.

Regarding the Ship of Theseus, our identity is most likely tied to an ever evolving process that depends on the architecture of our brains rather than a fixed set of molecular components. Beside the neuronal DNA, most if not all cell components are subject to a turnover.

Re: IBM's Watson Memorized 'Urban Dictionary,' Then His Overlords Had to Delete It

#148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Eh. Every field has its jargon. Techies who mock business lingo live in exceedingly fragile glass houses.

Techie jargon is generally meant to enhance communication, while biz jargon is meant to baffle the listener with bullshit. Huge difference.

That's because you're not a biz person.

I've had business types say exactly the same to me about tech jargon.

Re: IBM's Watson Memorized 'Urban Dictionary,' Then His Overlords Had to Delete It

#150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Eh. Every field has its jargon. Techies who mock business lingo live in exceedingly fragile glass houses.

Techie jargon is generally meant to enhance communication, while biz jargon is meant to baffle the listener with bullshit. Huge difference.

You do not work at a telco do you? There are so many abbreviations floating around that it sometimes is very hard to figure out if it is business bullshit or not.
Post reply on HN