Live data from Hacker News

IBM's Watson Memorized 'Urban Dictionary,' Then His Overlords Had to Delete It

theatlantic.com

81–90 of 163 posts

Re: IBM's Watson Memorized 'Urban Dictionary,' Then His Overlords Had to Delete It

#81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In 2029, when we are still not able to 'upload our brains' into a computer, I will come back here specifically to call bullshit.

I'd imagine the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-cloning_theorem has something to say about a brain upload. Maybe an approximate copy is good enough?

You might not be able to make a perfect quantum copy, but with iterative refinement you can get arbitrarily close. I think 99.9999999% or so would be good enough.

Re: IBM's Watson Memorized 'Urban Dictionary,' Then His Overlords Had to Delete It

#82
post #6

I guess we should be glad they didn't feed it the contents of knowyourmeme.com or we'd have Watson Rick Rolling us on Jeopardy.

Might as well just let Watson loose on 4chan/b, then he'd really start rustling people's jimmies.

rusting people's jimmies... gonna have to get a Watson ruling on that one.

Re: IBM's Watson Memorized 'Urban Dictionary,' Then His Overlords Had to Delete It

#83
post #24

Nothing that Watson learned from the Urban Dictionary could possibly be any dirtier than what I hear from enterprise people all the time: "We use our deep subject matter expertise to deliver value through actionable advice that enables our clients to harness the power of best practices in order to shift their paradigms and achieve 10X deltas against competitive industry metrics."

WATCH YOUR LANGUAGE, THIS IS A FAMILY SITE!

Re: IBM's Watson Memorized 'Urban Dictionary,' Then His Overlords Had to Delete It

#84
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If the singularity had a bullshit detector, it would kick Ray Kurzweil out.

Could someone explain the Ray Kurzweil hate to me? Predicting the future is hard.

Kurzweil is certainly a very smart guy, and he's done a lot of important things. I think people are uncomfortable with how specific he is when making predictions. He also makes predictions in many fields in which he isn't an expert, but a well-informed observer.

I'm not informed enough to comment on his actual predictions, but I've heard him defend himself. His response to criticism that I've heard is, "my critics are uninformed about fact X," but he doesn't make an attempt to justify X. That approach strikes me as disrespectful and intellectually dishonest, as it's a tactic used by many hucksters and snake oil salesmen. I have a limited understanding of his positions, but the way he presents himself makes me uneasy.

Re: IBM's Watson Memorized 'Urban Dictionary,' Then His Overlords Had to Delete It

#85
post #24

Nothing that Watson learned from the Urban Dictionary could possibly be any dirtier than what I hear from enterprise people all the time: "We use our deep subject matter expertise to deliver value through actionable advice that enables our clients to harness the power of best practices in order to shift their paradigms and achieve 10X deltas against competitive industry metrics."

Eh. Every field has its jargon. Techies who mock business lingo live in exceedingly fragile glass houses.

Re: IBM's Watson Memorized 'Urban Dictionary,' Then His Overlords Had to Delete It

#86
"In tests it even used the word "bullshit" in an answer to a researcher's query" — Has to be the funniest thing I've heard all week. Sounds like something straight out of an Adam Sandler movie. This reminds me of an AI chat program I used to have called Billy. He would learn from your words and sentences, actually quite smart and I remember adding in slang words so whenever one of my friends would use it, it would most likely swear and insult them without realising it. The Billy program can be downloaded from here, still works quite well: http://www.leedberg.com/glsoft/billyproject.shtml

Re: IBM's Watson Memorized 'Urban Dictionary,' Then His Overlords Had to Delete It

#88
post #24

Nothing that Watson learned from the Urban Dictionary could possibly be any dirtier than what I hear from enterprise people all the time: "We use our deep subject matter expertise to deliver value through actionable advice that enables our clients to harness the power of best practices in order to shift their paradigms and achieve 10X deltas against competitive industry metrics."

Eh. Every field has its jargon. Techies who mock business lingo live in exceedingly fragile glass houses.

Techie jargon is generally meant to enhance communication, while biz jargon is meant to baffle the listener with bullshit. Huge difference.

Re: IBM's Watson Memorized 'Urban Dictionary,' Then His Overlords Had to Delete It

#89
post #59

What an interesting reflection on who we are as a species. We build systems to organize who we are (urbandictionary) but hate it when the systems use that information tell us who we are (watson). It feels so much like the emperor isn't wearing any clothes. Perhaps an appropriate response would be for the computer to measure the tension in the human voice response to it's queries and optimize for lower tension. So it…

Or as a culture. It seems to me that the gap between what language is acceptable in informal vs formal settings is fairly large in the US, while in other countries, using words like 'bullshit' in more formal settings is less taboo.

Wonder if there's any research on this.

Re: IBM's Watson Memorized 'Urban Dictionary,' Then His Overlords Had to Delete It

#90
post #59

What an interesting reflection on who we are as a species. We build systems to organize who we are (urbandictionary) but hate it when the systems use that information tell us who we are (watson). It feels so much like the emperor isn't wearing any clothes. Perhaps an appropriate response would be for the computer to measure the tension in the human voice response to it's queries and optimize for lower tension. So it…

It's more like they couldn't have Watson using them on national television. Many a company, even if it weren't showcasing a machine like Watson, would want to avoid that language on a huge television event like the Jeopardy challenge. I think you might be looking a little too deeply at this.
Post reply on HN