Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm also going to Beijing, albeit for a short trip, this summer -- my business partner is there right now doing a year of study abroad, and I've been thinking along the same lines as you. Although I don't think you get $60/hr for teaching English, unless you mean the equivalent of that in local wages. That said, how do you plan on coping with the Great Firewall? We've had nothing but problems with connectivity outsid…
You can target wealthy families, build relationships so that you get recommended to their friends, and market yourself as an upscale tutor. Re: firewall, I haven't found it to be particularly problematic. Just set up a server in the US and use an SSH tunnel. The speed can be slow, but you should be ok as long as you're not trying to stream video or the like.
The Real High-Tech Immigrant Problem: They’re Leaving
81–90 of 129 posts
Re: The Real High-Tech Immigrant Problem: They’re Leaving
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
Okay, sure. But then I'd have to think of an explanation for why adopted Asian-Americans do just as well (or better) academically than Asian-Americans raised by their own parents. Culture can't explain that. Maybe you could help me out?
You're looking to compare the psychology of adopted Asian-Americans and un-adopted Asian-Americans? This is definitely a place where correlation can be a million things other than causation. I'm no social scientist, but two things come to mind right away: Consider the financial situation of a household which adopts children - adoption is a very expensive and rigorous process, so adopted children of any nationality ar…
Now, let's get to the proof side of things. What evidence makes you think this is a good explanation for the range of phenomena that you see? What else does it explain? Why can we discount other explanations, etc.
Re: The Real High-Tech Immigrant Problem: They’re Leaving
#83Well actually the labor government in Australia is currently reviewing the migrant intake policies mentioned in the main article ... http://www.iht.com/articles/2009/01/18/business/ozjobs.2-410... But it looks like we're going to keep up the high intake for the most part. We're certainly not losing any from what I've observed. As an aside I have to say I haven't seen much of anti-immigration sentiment here even with…
I actually think we should increase the rate. Double it. Triple it, even. There will need to be a concommitent infrastructure investment but with that, no problem. This should be a time of amazing opportunity to absorb the talent leaving other countries.
But I don't think the media and public would respond well to it with companies like pacific brands and the mining companies laying of so many in the last few weeks. It's probably best if the government doesn't rock the boat on immigration, lest we get a public reaction against it.
Re: The Real High-Tech Immigrant Problem: They’re Leaving
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
> every other day you get news about some guy who > On the other hand, I personally know some people (about 15 persons) Not to defend the US Immigration service, but those samples aren't comparable - one is orders of magnitude larger and less reliable.
"Not to defend the US Immigration service, but those samples aren't comparable - one is orders of magnitude larger and less reliable." Not to defend the climate of fear generated by media scare stories, but it's more complex than that - the problem isn't that every once in a while someone screws up; the problem is that it can happen at all and they're not screw-ups, it's policy. Everyone knows someone with a story ab…
Everyone knows someone who has a friend who knew the guy who tried to dry his poodle in the microwave.
I'm not saying that Immigration and/or Homeland Security is great, but the rumor-mongering is unjustified.
> the problem is that it can happen at all and they're not screw-ups, it's policy.
And you know this because....
> I am an Australian citizen from birth
Ah, Australia. I know a Stanford CS PhD student who was put through hell by the Australian equivalent of US Immigration/Homeland Security because she wanted to visit a guy who she met while he was in the US. They were concerned that she might want to stay, contaminate the gene pool, or somesuch. (She's pretty and white, so they weren't applying any sort of appearance standard.)
Really. I actually know her. And, you should have paid her to emmigrate because she is seriously talented. And yes, she was seriously pissed.
Nevertheless, I don't get hysterical about it. I'm looking forward to diving the Great Barrier Reef in a couple of years.
> If I want to enter the US I face being photographed and my fingerprints taken like a common criminal.
I don't know how things are in Australia, but we can't identify criminals and the like without actually checking. (For some reason, they don't mention that in their visa application.)
Are you suggesting that we shouldn't try?
Re: The Real High-Tech Immigrant Problem: They’re Leaving
#85Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wait a minute! Media disinformation campaign? So you are saying that there never existed a camp in Guantanamo Bay where the prisoners waited eight years without right to trial, placed in Cuba to avoid U.S. constitutional law? I've never used the word Nazi in an argument, so I won't start now, but it's really difficult.
If you actually examine the legal issues in depth, it's way more complicated and nuanced that what you imply; that simplifies the problem to the point of falsehood. Something that the Obama administration has actually flat-out said (or "admitted", if you prefer), albeit not to anywhere near the media blitz of the accusations, when they said they need a year to look at the issues involved with closure, because it's no…
As a for instance... why would "avoiding US constitutional law"
matter when it doesn't cover the detainees anyhow, as the
Constitution only really covers citizens?
This is dead wrong. The Constitution covers all residents of the United States. Even illegal aliens are entitled to constitutional protections thanks to the 14th Amendment, which specifically says that no state shall "...deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." See the cases of Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 369, 6 Sup. Ct. 1064. and Wong Wing v. U S, 163 U.S. 228 (1896) 163 U.S. 228.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yick_Wo_v._Hopkins
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wong_Wing_v._United_States
Now, the U.S. argued under Bush (and perhaps is still arguing?) that the detainees at Guantanamo are neither citizens nor are they within the territory United States. But I think this theory is far from completely decided. Arguing that Guantanamo is somehow not part of the territory of the United States, when clearly we exert our sovereignty there takes a special sort of blind sightedness. Furthermore, after Guantanamo is closed, if the detainees are brought onto US soil, then the Constitution will unquestionably apply to them.
Getting back to my original point: saying that the Constitution only applies to citizens likewise ignores nuance and simplifies the problem to the point of falsehood.
Re: The Real High-Tech Immigrant Problem: They’re Leaving
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's tempting to think that the job market works that simply. However, it takes at least 10 years to train a good scientist / engineer. Waiting 10 years is a luxury. Moreover, people who choose a career based on earning power tend not to be talented or creative. In other words, people who would be attracted to Science / Engineering if the salaries would rise a bit are exactly the kind of people that make mediocre sci…
Link, please. I think you are painting with too broad a brush. Many people are attracted to many things, and economics is one of the factors they use to discriminate between them.
Re: The Real High-Tech Immigrant Problem: They’re Leaving
#87I'm a US citizen in the SF bay area, bootstrapping a web company by myself, and I'm heading out to Beijing this summer. PG talks a lot about reaching 'ramen profitability' and there's no easier place to hit that than China. It's going to cost me about $400 a month to live (frugally), and if I needed to, I could teach English for about $60 / hr. Worst case scenario, a native English speaker could dedicate one or two d…
Re: The Real High-Tech Immigrant Problem: They’re Leaving
#88I'm a US citizen in the SF bay area, bootstrapping a web company by myself, and I'm heading out to Beijing this summer. PG talks a lot about reaching 'ramen profitability' and there's no easier place to hit that than China. It's going to cost me about $400 a month to live (frugally), and if I needed to, I could teach English for about $60 / hr. Worst case scenario, a native English speaker could dedicate one or two d…
Out of curiosity, have you spent much time in China? More important, do you speak Chinese? I've spent a lot of time in Southeast Asia, but only a couple months in China. One thing that struck me there was that it's one of the few places where you really can't get by in English alone. I mean sure, you can feed yourself and find places to sleep, but it's really tough to get to know the people because pretty much nobody…
Re: The Real High-Tech Immigrant Problem: They’re Leaving
#89Earlier quoted context omitted.
Same here, but back in Argentina after many years in Europe. * ZERO visa problems, we welcome immigrants from hunger or financial disasters, since 1890 :) * Pretty women who like foreigners (never underestimate this!) * Great nightlife (or this.) * Projected economic growth (recession instead of depression.) * After '01 default, the country works on zero credit already (no surprises.) * But infrastructure and culture…
How easy it is to live there without knowing Spanish? What are the safer parts of the country? Also can you please estimate the monthly expenses?
There are no safe parts of the country as a whole, it depends on the citi or town you pick. The largest city, Buenos Aires, 13 million, is mostly OK if you follow some basic rules (e.g. don't carry expensive watches or too much money, and stay in nice parts of the city.) If you have a big budget, you can live in isolation within the very expensive neighborhoods. But beware, it can get as fancy as you can imagine and your expenses get to Manhattan-life level. There are many areas in this city.
About security outside Buenos Aires, security is mostly very good. There are a few exceptions and again, in large cities you are OK as long as you stay within OK areas.
And even in the not that common case of mugging, say you leave a house party at a friend's place, it goes like this: "give me your money", "here you go", you give them your wallet with $200 and the guy leaves. You lost u$d 57, big deal, yawn. Just always carry something over 50 so they take it and leave.
Argentina is the 8th largest country in the world with an extremely varied geography. Have a look in Wikipedia. There is mountain, sea, jungle, prairie, desert, you name it. :) My advice is don't plan settling before checking out the options. ADSL 3Mbit is available on most big cities for $40-$70. The quality of the connection varies significantly.
Budget varies a lot. Touristy prices are crazy high, don't fall into that. Temporary rent is also 50% more expensive. In BA an OK-good flat with 1 bedroom will go for u$d 350-500/mo and u$d 70-100 more for bills. In other towns you can get a beautiful house for that money. It all depends. Transport is cheap, just try to have always coins with you (trust me on this one.) Groceries depend on how fancy you live, for my spartan lifestyle is about u$d 55-80/week. Clothes and shoes are somewhat expensive, bring them. Same for skiing equipment and stuff like that. Computer hardware is mostly cheap, fancy things are a bit more expensive, like laptops.
Something important: Don't use your foreign credit card. If you plan to stay, get a basic account with debit card (also, payments with local debit card get 4%+ refund from taxes.)
And don't get too literal on statistics, in particular of the CIA "Factbook." For example, they say it is an "intermediate" chance of getting disease here. This is only applicable for people who come already in extreme poverty.
For more info drop me an email.
Re: The Real High-Tech Immigrant Problem: They’re Leaving
#90Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don't laugh, but it's a kind of patriotism. I love the country. It's beautiful. I like its philosophy. American values resonate close to my values. In the years I lived there I grew to think of it as my home much more than the country I was born in. I could see calling myself American. When I went there I was received well. I was helped. I made friends. Now I think I can help in return. I would like to contribute, es…
Did you look into the following two categories of GreenCard Visa's ? (EB4/EB5)It seems you get a Visa in 9 months. 1. Entreprenurs .... You start a business and hire 4-5 FT US employees 2. Investment .... Invest 500K in some Federal designated area.