Live data from Hacker News

Chopping up books when they're physically too big

attainablefelicity.mattkirkland.com

151–160 of 211 posts

Re: Chopping up books when they're physically too big

#151

This is done by default in Japan. Most long books are sold as different volumes, parts, etc. At first I didn't really like it (especially because you'd have to buy both Vol.1 and 2 for the whole thing), but it makes sense if you're going to be bringing books around with you.

I've gotten really used to it too. I find myself reading more because I can carry most books in the side pocket of my shorts or whatever.

Re: Chopping up books when they're physically too big

#152
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That makes no sense to me though. I always prefer physical books to any ereader, but I still stopped accumulating (new) books in my flat - they just accumulate space. I'll always love hardcopy books, but not needing them as a physical hardcopy is just better for me.

I just get rid of most books after reading, knowing that I won’t reread the great majority of them or need them as a reference. For the few that I might unexpectedly end up wanting to reread, it’s okay if I’ll have to reprocure them. That case hasn’t occurred so far.

This one. Recently I added "re-f" property to my templates for the Review base in Obsidian ie how probable a review/reread/rewatch factor that title has. And it's quite liberating to juas write zero there and remove/delete the title. Also helps with datahoarding tendecies.

Re: Chopping up books when they're physically too big

#153
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well that's certainly the most ridiculous way of keeping track I've ever heard of :D Not only do you always have to scroll through the pages to find the right one, you also have to mess with your phone a bit first.

I would assume that the photo includes the page number.

It does. I photograph the page, not a super close-up of a few words of text.

Re: Chopping up books when they're physically too big

#154

Are AI companies trying to poison the search index? Like Boris Johnson did when he had fun times with a model on the campaign bus, then did a bizarre interview when he claimed he made model buses! https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jun/26/mesmerising...

Damn, did news articles ~7 years ago really just consist of a series of embedded tweets? It feels familiar but also kind of jarring.

They still do, to the best of my knowledge, although they have started incorporation reddit discussion too.

Re: Chopping up books when they're physically too big

#155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Fire is pretty effective too, in my experience.

Floods are pretty bad for them too. I have some books drying now, some paper is really bad about getting wet while others are okay.

they're not exactly thrilled by termites either. lost a lot of my grandparents' books to that.

Re: Chopping up books when they're physically too big

#156
post #20

This seems like a lot of work for not a huge payoff. I get that the feel and experience of a physical book has a certain nostalgia, but for me, I'd just leave the big monster on the shelf and grab an epub from Anna's Archive. You have already ensured the author and publisher get paid, you might as well read on an e-reader, which is in my opinion superior in nearly every way to a physical book. Ebooks sync across devi…

for a lot of people the huge payoff is the experience of reading a physical book. the ergonomics and sensory aspects are very different.

Re: Chopping up books when they're physically too big

#157
post #20

This seems like a lot of work for not a huge payoff. I get that the feel and experience of a physical book has a certain nostalgia, but for me, I'd just leave the big monster on the shelf and grab an epub from Anna's Archive. You have already ensured the author and publisher get paid, you might as well read on an e-reader, which is in my opinion superior in nearly every way to a physical book. Ebooks sync across devi…

Not one of the things you mentioned about ebooks actually interests me. On the other hand, physical books are more comfortable to read, enjoyable to hold in your hands and flip the pages, don't ever run out of charge, and look nice when you put them on a shelf. For me, they are vastly superior to ebooks. I say all this not to try to convince you that you're wrong (it's all a matter of taste after all), but to point o…

agreed! I'm actually pulled in different directions; I love the nostalgic value of physical books and enjoy possessing them as artefacts, but I vastly prefer the experience of reading an ebook, especially the page turning with one finger.

Re: Chopping up books when they're physically too big

#159

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I once read that the only way you can actually damage a book, is by not reading it.

Well, one can damage a hardcover by not opening it properly the first time: https://www.reddit.com/r/lifehacks/comments/7sry7v/open_a_ha... (which was a lesson in 2nd grade, when we got our first-ever hardcover textbooks)

Wow. I’m almost 40 and never knew this!

Re: Chopping up books when they're physically too big

#160
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well that's certainly the most ridiculous way of keeping track I've ever heard of :D Not only do you always have to scroll through the pages to find the right one, you also have to mess with your phone a bit first.

I would assume that the photo includes the page number.

It's still O(log n) to find the right page from a closed book.

Compare that entire rube goldberg machine with one button press on an e-reader.

Post reply on HN