Earlier quoted context omitted.
> How are people getting this "waste of time not to use AI" and "generates 99% of my code" level of code quality? They don't know what n+1 problem is and they don't know about long-term maintainability.
tbf many human devs I've worked with don't think about n+1 and similar issues and need constant reminders. overall software quality seems largely unchanged
OTOH, if someone insists on writing bad code—even after being advised otherwise—then they should expect to be out of a job.
Doesn't seem like "terminated junior developer" is the level of quality we should be accepting or promoting for AI.