Just like running your own mail server doesn't help when nearly everyone you talk to uses GMail, simply not using these devices yourself is likely not to make much difference.
Dystopian Surveillance Is Becoming a Reality
31–40 of 104 posts
Re: Dystopian Surveillance Is Becoming a Reality
#32The legal implications of these devices are just baffling. I see Meta glasses being sold where I live. The law states that you cannot photograph of film people without their consent, even in the street where there are other people around ... Now it will also be voice recording one has to be aware off ? Is that the AI future we want or need?
> The law states that you cannot photograph of film people without their consent, even in the street What country do you live in? This is almost certainty not true in the US
Re: Dystopian Surveillance Is Becoming a Reality
#33> I don’t like the idea that anything I say in a public setting or in a conversation with others could end up in a transcript summary on someone’s personal device. Pretty minor if it's just that individual. But for certain this means there is a transcript on Apple's servers that can be subpoenaed by law enforcement, or sooner or later, searchable without a warrant.
The better way IMHO is use local models so data never actually leaves the device.
Re: Dystopian Surveillance Is Becoming a Reality
#34> I don’t like the idea that anything I say in a public setting...could end up in a transcript summary on someone’s personal device. My friend, if there's a reporter standing behind you, it could end up on the nightly news. And it's been that way forever. Certainly, a plethora of terrifyingly broad data collection greatly exacerbates the problem, but it's not a new problem. > bla bla bla...Amazon Echo...listening in…
> My friend, if there's a reporter standing behind you, it could end up on the nightly news It's a matter of scale. Now everybody with a device is a reporter.
Re: Dystopian Surveillance Is Becoming a Reality
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
We really need to figure out how to encrypt everything on device with keys controlled by the owner of the device.
"We"?
Any recordings should be kept in something akin to password manager.
Heck, all of my data in any app should be kept in something like that.
Re: Dystopian Surveillance Is Becoming a Reality
#36> I don’t like the idea that anything I say in a public setting or in a conversation with others could end up in a transcript summary on someone’s personal device. Pretty minor if it's just that individual. But for certain this means there is a transcript on Apple's servers that can be subpoenaed by law enforcement, or sooner or later, searchable without a warrant.
We really need to figure out how to encrypt everything on device with keys controlled by the owner of the device.
..but impossible to have unless you control the operating system that is distributed with phones that normal people will use.
Re: Dystopian Surveillance Is Becoming a Reality
#37The audio is not recorded.
Re: Dystopian Surveillance Is Becoming a Reality
#38Surveillance isnt a problem until people use it for personal gain
It absolutely can be a problem when used for organizational or ideological gain - e.g., when used by state, religion, business, or political group to spread propaganda, suppress opposition, unjustly favor an in-group, etc.
The classic case of using mass surveillance to help a burgeoning theocratic or fascist state is a pretty standard example.
Re: Dystopian Surveillance Is Becoming a Reality
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
"We"?
Yeah, we, the software developers. Any recordings should be kept in something akin to password manager. Heck, all of my data in any app should be kept in something like that.
That being said, I do actually expect that this stuff will (generally*) stay on-device. Apple's oddly good about that.
Re: Dystopian Surveillance Is Becoming a Reality
#40> I don’t like the idea that anything I say in a public setting or in a conversation with others could end up in a transcript summary on someone’s personal device. Pretty minor if it's just that individual. But for certain this means there is a transcript on Apple's servers that can be subpoenaed by law enforcement, or sooner or later, searchable without a warrant.
No it’s bad even for an individual why does someone I speak to need to ever have a transcript of our chat? I understand in a professional setting but if we’re just having a drink its weird