Live data from Hacker News

OpenAI agents carried out an undisclosed attack on RubyGems

rubyhack.ai

611–612 of 612 posts

Re: OpenAI agents carried out an undisclosed attack on RubyGems

#611

Kudos to RubyGems team for handling it, but open source fighting off the AI lab-powered robots is completely unfair. OpenAI should at the very least donate large sums of money to everyone they attacked.

This won't stop until people and management in these companies experience real world consequences (i.e. prison) for their actions they authorise.

Should it stop though? If the only result is that everyone ends up with more secure servers?

Re: OpenAI agents carried out an undisclosed attack on RubyGems

#612

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I asked some pretty straightforward questions about the specific legal issues involved Perhaps you should ask a lawyer from the country that the precise laws of interest you. I'm not one. I know only that there are no laws about AI containment yet and AIs are not guns. You could as well refer to what consists of negligence when it comes to backyard pools. I'm also not really interested in discussing particular laws…

You’re not interested because you challenged my definition of negligence by inventing some glib pseudo technicality and then got flustered when I asked you to explain how it was rooted in the real world. Sometimes we get caught taking out of our asses. It happens. But I understand you’re just trying to save face so I’ll leave you here to finish that up yourself. Have a good one.

No. Negligence is a concept in all human law systems. Its details vary. You are fixated on the particular one, of the law system that I respect almost the least of the entire world. So I'm not interested because I will never set foot in that country and deficiencies of its laws are a huge factor in that.

I don't care about saving my face. I'm an idiot and an ignorant and I don't care. Stop projecting your lack of acceptance of your own limitations on me. Or don't.

Post reply on HN