Live data from Hacker News

I spent $220 on Google app ads and 60% of the installs were robots

dayzlegame.com

301–310 of 434 posts

Re: I spent $220 on Google app ads and 60% of the installs were robots

#301
Why do you make Google stronger by giving it money?

I don't disagree that these findings may be useful for other users, who can now look more at suspicious bot behaviour - but all of that money empowers Evil. Let's not let Google off the hook. Remember why they went against ublock origin. They want people to use of ads, so you ultimately contribute to evil harassment via such pester-ads that further sustain Google's de-facto monopoly. This is bad from A to Z.

Re: I spent $220 on Google app ads and 60% of the installs were robots

#302

My favorite story: 1. Dev publishes app with Google Admob integration to the Play Store. 2. Buys Google Ads to drive traffic to the app. 3. Google Admob bans his account for invalid traffic. https://www.reddit.com/r/admob/comments/1vzg3fu/i_paid_googl...

That's double ironic because Google feeds off of ad-money addiction, but here it also uses that traffic to ban people from the evil Google empire (which is actually pretty good, if everyone would be banned then Google would collapse quickly. Without adMoney this adCompany would be useless. It has nothing to do with the old Google company before the adMoney inflow addiction).

Re: I spent $220 on Google app ads and 60% of the installs were robots

#303

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Exactly my thought. For, say, $50/month I can get a second ISP to my house, host the proxy (and only that) on that link, and enjoy free movies. It is cheaper than having 2-3 streaming service subscriptions.

Or for $5/mo you could have a mullvad subscription and a vpn-aware bittorrent client that knows how to pause if the vpn drops.

You're underestimating the ease of use of these pirate boxes.

Also most of them are for pirating live TV. You can't watch live TV through Bittorrent, you just can't, it doesn't work that way. Sports fans need less than 5 seconds of latency relative to the loudest neighbor they can hear, or they'll hate your service.

Re: I spent $220 on Google app ads and 60% of the installs were robots

#304

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is one of the primary reasons why fraud actors purchase residential proxies in bulk now. Google "residential proxies for sale" for the tip of a huge grey/black market iceberg. You know all those trojan infected smart TVs and home routers and such? That's one of the things they're doing.

Grey? There's multiple conferences that "ethically sourced" proxy providers feature at now (ex: extractsummit.io) Web scraping (for LLM inference / training) I guess has transformed "residential proxies" into a giant industry.

"ethically sourced" means someone clicked "agree" on their LG TV terms of service, as opposed to having a virus on their computer

Re: I spent $220 on Google app ads and 60% of the installs were robots

#305

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You also get to run credit card fraud purchases through your home internet connection, such fun times we live in.

So what's the catch? Has anyone ever been arrested for proxying a fraudulent credit card transaction?

Probably not. But do you really want the hassle of explaining the proxy to the police when they get a report of CSAM content uploaded from your IP?

Re: I spent $220 on Google app ads and 60% of the installs were robots

#306

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was getting an advert that was obviously some scam software on YouTube mobile. The image looked like a system alert that storage was low. It was an obvious attempt to trick users. https://bsky.app/profile/atomic14.bsky.social/post/3mnc7ws2h... Perfectly fine according to google.

Funny, I too reported it a long time ago, with the predictable response that it’s not breaking any of Google’s rules. It also tells me how primitive Google Ads are, when they keep showing me an ad I reported.

> It also tells me how primitive Google Ads are, when they keep showing me an ad I reported.

Why wouldn't they? They still get paid for it, and if you could block an ad by reporting it, you'd just report every ad until there were no ads.

Re: I spent $220 on Google app ads and 60% of the installs were robots

#307

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's 'make work' because it's a unnecessarily competitive system wherein prices will by definition be driven up to absorb all of the surpluses of any given business. Google and Facebook are in the business of 'economic rent' of people's attention. 25% of sales price going to Google might leave 5% for manufacturer and possibly even more for the Ad channel. Aka 'Google is where most of your profits are absorbed'. You'r…

Real estate?

Basically any time you can get people to bid for a limited resource and can't make more of the resource, the house wins - no pun intended. Be the house.

Re: I spent $220 on Google app ads and 60% of the installs were robots

#308
post #277

I've been in go to market for the better part of 20 years now (anyone remember the DigitalOcean youtube ads of the 2012-2014 era?), paid online advertising has basically gone to shit, it started about 6 years ago, but over the past 3-4 years outside of linkedin it's effectively pointless, over 55% of Americans run ad blockers now and around 40% globally - on top of that, what you do get it mostly just... bots. In Jan…

Even 6 years ago people were saying the market had gone to shit in the last 6 years

Re: I spent $220 on Google app ads and 60% of the installs were robots

#310
post #135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I once did this by accident and without a bot farm. It was very lucrative. What I did was create a game with an action button. Then I served ads right next to the action button. I didn’t realize people would miss click on the ads at a high rate, but they did. They fat fingered it, clicked the ad, I got paid. I looked into it after a couple weeks because my click rate was crazy high.

That's definitely a core principle of crapware that's widely done. Put that ad 0px away from the "mash here like crazy" button, PROFIT!

The back button in Android seems to be a popular one especially when it's only contextually visible on some phones.
Post reply on HN