Live data from Hacker News

I spent $220 on Google app ads and 60% of the installs were robots

dayzlegame.com

151–160 of 434 posts

Re: I spent $220 on Google app ads and 60% of the installs were robots

#151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wait, so I can have free movies and subvert the adtech business model at the same time? What's the catch?

Exactly my thought. For, say, $50/month I can get a second ISP to my house, host the proxy (and only that) on that link, and enjoy free movies. It is cheaper than having 2-3 streaming service subscriptions.

Or for $5/mo you could have a mullvad subscription and a vpn-aware bittorrent client that knows how to pause if the vpn drops.

Re: I spent $220 on Google app ads and 60% of the installs were robots

#152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Exactly my thought. For, say, $50/month I can get a second ISP to my house, host the proxy (and only that) on that link, and enjoy free movies. It is cheaper than having 2-3 streaming service subscriptions.

Or for $5/mo you could have a mullvad subscription and a vpn-aware bittorrent client that knows how to pause if the vpn drops.

True but that option got a lot worse when they disabled port forwarding.

Re: I spent $220 on Google app ads and 60% of the installs were robots

#153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

These residential proxies are also used by scrapers. From scraping stores to scalp merchandise, to scrapers of data for AI training.

Sounds awesome, what's the catch?

You also get to run credit card fraud purchases through your home internet connection, such fun times we live in.

Re: I spent $220 on Google app ads and 60% of the installs were robots

#154
post #84
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why can’t Google do this? Surely their data is better than yours. They get paid for adverts to bots don’t they? Unrelated?

Nobody wants to admit just how bad the bot problem is, because it starts to dig into the fact that advertising isn't nearly as effective as advertisers let on

Let the Google Ads account run dry, discover your Analytics never actually goes down. It was just donating to multibillionaires the whole time.

Re: I spent $220 on Google app ads and 60% of the installs were robots

#155
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are pretty much all ecommerce brands wasting their money on Meta ads? Seems hard to believe.

Meta ads are mostly obvious fraud afaict - unregistered lotteries, jet washes that don't need power, flashlights so powerful they'll fry an egg by shining at them, household goods developed by NASA, air-conditioning/heating that doesn't need outside air and plugs direct into a socket, ... I've reported a few to Advertising Standards in the UK, but they're not really interested in combatting Facebook/Amazon fraud. Wha…

> flashlights so powerful they'll fry an egg by shining at them

Flashlights that can do this exist. I don't know if they're being advertised on Meta platforms.

Re: I spent $220 on Google app ads and 60% of the installs were robots

#156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lawsuit time!

I would suspect that entities affected don't have money for a lawsuit.

Are most Americans not able to fight an international tech conglomerate at the drop of a hat?

Re: I spent $220 on Google app ads and 60% of the installs were robots

#160
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>the reported CPI of 2.4%, which of course is nowhere near the actual increase in life's necessities but does show that you can get TVs cheap I went through the CPI basket[1] and vaguely looked for categories "life's necessities" and came up with "Food and beverages", "Shelter", "Fuels and utilities", "Transportation", "Medical care", "Education and communication". Those categories alone make up 85.3% of the basket,…

What did gas cost a year ago and what does it cost now?

Energy going up 16%, because gasoline went up 30%, is the main reason "core CPI" and full CPI are a full percent apart, 2.4% versus 3.4%.
Post reply on HN