Moonshot serves Claude instead of Kimi and collects exchanges for model training
1–10 of 74 posts
Re: Moonshot serves Claude instead of Kimi and collects exchanges for model training
#2Re: Moonshot serves Claude instead of Kimi and collects exchanges for model training
#3Re: Moonshot serves Claude instead of Kimi and collects exchanges for model training
#4There also is nothing wrong with using customer data for training, since millions if not billions of other users benefit from it. Again, even the big players recognize its relevance and do it.
Re: Moonshot serves Claude instead of Kimi and collects exchanges for model training
#5But when same AI company gets "distilled" or it's own AI-generated content used to train other models, it's suddenly immoral or illegal?
Re: Moonshot serves Claude instead of Kimi and collects exchanges for model training
#6Re: Moonshot serves Claude instead of Kimi and collects exchanges for model training
#7There is absolutely nothing ethically wrong with other models using GPT and Claude for training. Heck, GPT-Sol even helped train GPT-Luna. There also is nothing wrong with using customer data for training, since millions if not billions of other users benefit from it. Again, even the big players recognize its relevance and do it.
Re: Moonshot serves Claude instead of Kimi and collects exchanges for model training
#8Re: Moonshot serves Claude instead of Kimi and collects exchanges for model training
#9>PLA-affiliated surveillance activity. One user that we assess was likely affiliated with the PLA used what they thought was Moonshot’s Kimi model to load surveillance data from a CCTV archive about a single targeted individual. The user asked Kimi to analyze the CCTV data to understand whether the tracked person was behaving abnormally. The CCTV data included video surveillance from hundreds of cameras in Chengdu, including cameras outside PLA facilities, institutes affiliated with the China Electronics Technology Group Corporation, and a major state-owned enterprise (SOE).