Live data from Hacker News

What will our economic future look like?

anthropic.com

441–445 of 445 posts

Re: What will our economic future look like?

#441

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's probably a good idea to note that it cost them 10-15 million dollars in tokens to do so.

Sure, but the cost-per-token is falling very rapidly. That cost will be mere thousands of dollars for a "million dollar problem" soon.

[dead]

Re: What will our economic future look like?

#442
post #396

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Making everyone poor never made the world better.

Aren't "not rich" and "poor" very different things?

Both are relative terms so they can be the same or different depending on who defines them. Nearly everyone that works in the US is rich by worldwide standards, so it's not clear that a lack of billionaires for example would make things better. Sans Amazon, Apple or Google, would the US be better off? I'm not convinced.

Re: What will our economic future look like?

#443
post #360

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> you envision a future where there will be say a hospital, ran by anthropic which is AI powered fully, no company behind it, just plain Claude running everything from the moment you walk in till you walk out Everything as much as possible, yes, and the company behind it will be an AI driven autonomous corporation as well. Although I suspect that by then there will be some industry specific AI model being used by hos…

You can bet that every major company CEO on the planet is creaming his jeans at the thought of AI doing every task (except their own) that they currently pay humans to do. Their ideal end state is that the company is themself, thousands of AIs and thousands of robots, zero payroll. Every one of them is dreaming of this.

From what I've seen of CEO's, they can be the first ones replaced.

They're inhuman(e). They hallucinate, and have devoured volumes of Harvard Business Review.

Re: What will our economic future look like?

#445
By which reason can they cap the knowledge workers displacement at 39.7% in the extreme case? Maybe they want to reason that without robots its impossible to replace the last 22% but even specialised devices would be enough in the worst case.

I think in the worst case knowledge work will go to the capital rich 1% as legal representative for the companies and their shareholders.

And with robotics all 99% of the workforce could be gone. Because AI does not need to be perfect it only needs to be cheaper and good enough.

Post reply on HN