Earlier quoted context omitted.
1. is a bit contradictory or at the least a "devils in the details" wishful fantasy which hasn't been showcased convincingly in the wild yet (by "the wild", I mean software eng shops and corps). It's assumed the devs who have taste were able to implement their taste fine pre-AI, sure, but the whole gotcha in 1. is that the ones with good taste currently are not confident in implementing their good taste while simulta…
I disagree. There is a lot of boilerplate to write and mundane things to check, which AI can speed up a lot. I'm not talking about 'software engineering' here, but about 'programming', which consists of a lot of write DTO->write rest interface->write interface->write simple select query->map response. The good taste here comes from the architectural design and the UI design. The amount of 'software engineers' who cou…
It's like if I asked an LLM to produce a contract for a a new hire
(my friend the one I mentioned, did that BTW LOL)
Yeah, okay, it might be good, probably very good, in fact might be GREAT.
But I just have no clue