Live data from Hacker News

Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

ai.meta.com

681–690 of 720 posts

Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

#681
I think this is another VR moment for Meta. It wasn't necessarily a terrible idea to invest in VR - I mean it was but let's suspend disbelief for a moment - but Meta is not the company that would succeed in that market. Meta is not a hardware company, not really, and is not an "experiences" company. VR would have had to rely on a lot of premium content, and either you have a company like Disney controlling their own ecosystem or who do you think Disney is going to work with, Meta or Apple?

I tried to explain to my Meta colleagues with the virtual reality push was absolutely doomed to fail no matter how good the hardware was and this is the same. Nobody is going to look at Meta for a personal assistant, the world has caught on and besides nobody things about Facebook as the place that is useful, that's Google.

Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

#683

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What you think is "terribly Ineffcient" can be also considered "perfectly acceptable and resilient to systemic shocks". Hyperfixation on efficiency gains is a disease of modern society.

Copy pasting ai code from the browser is not perfectly acceptable. The only reason to do it is because you haven’t tried agents. It shows a lack of imagination and a willingness to settle for inferiority.

I tried Claude in agent mode, as I wrote in grand^4 parent - specifically in https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49622329

Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

#687

Judging from the website, Muse seems to be too keen on making me buy things - Book Tickets, Buy a Stroller. Would this personal AI spam me with ads randomly like this?

having used it for a bit, yes, one of the first things it asked me for, unprompted, were things to set it up to buy stuff. i declined but it still consistently wants to spend money; research a trip? as soon as it has any results it prompts to start booking stuff. etc.

[dead]

Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

#689
post #234

I think Meta's strategy is to capture the 'normie-tier' of AI users. I know most of us here on HN track model releases quite frequently and discuss every parameter weight out of them, but most of the world is just... oblivious? I was discussing latest in tech with an accounting friend out of curiosity, and I kept talking about tiers of GPT-5.6 (Sol vs Terra vs Luna) and asked which one she used on the desktop 'Work'…

[flagged]

Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

#690
post #597

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Former meta prick, sorry employee: > Meta's strategy Meta has no strategy. The people that made llama work left two years ago. MSI are a bunch of charlatans who are trying to change the culutre and tooling of meta from the outside (I can see their point, trying to work outside of the defaults is incredibly hard.) its basically a bun fight, with all of your productive workers being poached by frontier labs, and everyo…

Meta certainly do give the impression that they are burning through ridiculous amounts of cash with not much to show for it, and thats just from the outside.

Yeah, I was surprised to see they just gave DHH a $1.5m credit. Can't imagine they'll have good ROI on that (although what do I know)
Post reply on HN