Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT Images 2.5

openai.com

461–470 of 474 posts

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#461

Omg, I love how the first examples just show how easy you can fake things. Fake being at a party with your friends. Didn't make your bed, no problem, just fake it. The sad part is my mother would love "remixing" my old child photos of me.

Apple Intelligence received the same criticism when they launched Siri AI. Seems like the faking it, is a common product UC.

They famously have not launched Siri AI yet.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#462

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You’re mistaking your preferences for the majority’s preferences. Huge chunk of humanity now chooses to experience in-person events recording it through their phones.

Big difference between being at an event and recording it via your phone, and using ChatGPT to make an AI image of it. Images are not all the same.

In the first case presumably the person is focused on their phone/the photo instead of their friends, and in the 2nd it's the opposite (then making the photo after they're no longer with their friends). It could be said the latter is better?

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#463

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is quite common if you have full on aphantasia. I have a friend who only reads fiction for which he's seen the accompanying show first because he otherwise has no visual reference for the characters and environments.

> This is quite common if you have full on aphantasia. Is it? I’ve never really researched common aphantasia behavior, but I’ve seen many mentions of aphantasia in fantasy/scifi subreddits where those of us with it still love reading. I can imagine (heh) it, but I wonder if there’s some kind of data regarding it?

I don't know. I speak mostly from my own experience and that of my friends.

For me personally reading is still interesting and can be very engaging, but due to the logic of the story, characters, and universe; for lengthy descriptions of the appearance of the environment or the characters I quickly glaze over and get bored because they just don't do much for me (unless the appearances have some semantic significance in the story).

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#464

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was curious and tried to come up with a crude estimate - all of the golf courses in the US use approximately the same amount of energy (mowing, fertilizer, etc) as one 1GW DC does.

Is there such a thing as a 1GW data center? Like a beefy gaming PC easily uses 1 KW According to Google, an individual GPU tower consumes anywhere between 10-100kW. An 1GW data center is can fit in a size of a mid size apartment.

> An 1GW data center is can fit in a size of a mid size apartment.

Not even close, you're off by a few orders of magnitude. You can also easily find this info online https://www.electricchoice.com/datacenters/

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#465
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can't disagree more. A lot of shops in our city have done this and I actually miss the shitty photoshopped images that did not even look like the real life dish anyway. AI signs are way worse.

It might be a sub-comment on a tweet that was fairly viral last week. Or it might be serious. We’ll never know.

we will never know.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#466

I hope my local kebab shops switch to this for their signs.

One of my locally owned fried rice places doodled a simple pencil cartoon of them cooking fried rice to satisfy their evil landlord and it has cascaded into a series of mildly unhinged pencil cartoon doodles every few days on Facebook. It is an incredibly refreshing break from the local food/eats FB groups being utterly flooded with identical looking slop posters and has earned my business several times. Also it's ju…

Absolutely. I hope with all these Ai generated images it will only raise the value of human creativity/output

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#467

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Big difference between being at an event and recording it via your phone, and using ChatGPT to make an AI image of it. Images are not all the same.

In the first case presumably the person is focused on their phone/the photo instead of their friends, and in the 2nd it's the opposite (then making the photo after they're no longer with their friends). It could be said the latter is better?

No, because people talk to each other even when using their phones.

This is easily observable in literally any social situation.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#469
post #400

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What? He quotes the opening line of the article, and notes that he reacts negatively to it. Interpreting his sentiment as "curmudgeonly" is a clear exaggeration. And sure--it isn't a high-substance comment, but it isn't irrelevant either. It was, for a while, the top-voted comment on this whole thread. That shows people resonate with the thought, and it obviously sparked quite a lot of discussion. This seriously make…

This was not a borderline call! The GP comment is not in keeping with the kind of discussion we're hoping for, especially not at the top of a thread—which unfortunately is where cheap negative comments often end up. The problem isn't primarily with the comment, and in that sense conradludgate did nothing wrong. The problem is the upvotes. If it weren't for those, such comments wouldn't rise to the top and choke out m…

Seems like a great way to crush dissent.

But respect to you for replying to me. I wish you only the best in moderating, and I hope that this forum can remain healthy--especially in a time where enormously well-funded actors are flexing their power to set the narrative they want.

Re: ChatGPT Images 2.5

#470

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> This is quite common if you have full on aphantasia. Is it? I’ve never really researched common aphantasia behavior, but I’ve seen many mentions of aphantasia in fantasy/scifi subreddits where those of us with it still love reading. I can imagine (heh) it, but I wonder if there’s some kind of data regarding it?

I don't know. I speak mostly from my own experience and that of my friends. For me personally reading is still interesting and can be very engaging, but due to the logic of the story, characters, and universe; for lengthy descriptions of the appearance of the environment or the characters I quickly glaze over and get bored because they just don't do much for me (unless the appearances have some semantic significance…

Yeah, it's the same for me, but luckily those are very rare
Post reply on HN