Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

ai.meta.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

401–410 of 712 posts

Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

#401

Post by tyre »

paultreanor wrote: post #387

It's still very obvious that they have come up with genuine killer usecases for agents for normal life admin. Like this is the best they can do? "Tickets just opened for the movie you're tracking. 4:30 PM or 7:30 PM. Interesting?"

The problem is that most of the annoying parts of daily life are pretty personal and don't have clear APIs. Like, I need to coördinate with my building manager, a contractor and that contractor's insurance agency about their policy. A personal assistant would be great for this (it's all over email.)

But it's pretty niche and one-off for me. How do you market that? There are 20 of these random things per year, but no single one of them is likely to resonate generally.

Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

#402

Post by yalok »

Barbing wrote: post #339
yalok wrote: post #323

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure - it may as well be that regular consumers just don't realize they need this and will greatly benefit from it. My personal anecdote - we had a complex family travel in the summer, with 6 ppl and 6 separate flights booked (some multi-leg). SAS messed up on one booking - they decided to cancel the flight we had from Oslo, and rebooked us to an earlier date (2 days shift). That wouldn't work for the rest of…

Any privacy concerns you had connecting your email?

yes, it was not easy to mentally give that access, but then I heard from friends how much work was put in into securing it and separating LLM/agents from the API tokens access (also saw this detailed blog post from the lead developer - https://research.meta.ai/blog/security-and-safety-for-ai-age...), plus I had the pressure to get the problem resolved - so I decided to risk and try it out.

Eventually, though, Muse Confidential VM is an even more locked-in option coming, per that blog post...

Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

#403

Post by asveikau »

motoxpro wrote: post #395
asveikau wrote: post #280

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not playing games. All I said to enter this thread was: > I don't think normies have a positive association with meta. And a bunch of you guys contested this for some reason.

"Most Americans Still Like Facebook, Poll Finds—But Not Mark Zuckerberg Or Its New Meta Name" https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2021/11/02/most-am... Which was my point: CEO affinity =/= the affinity for the product people use

That article is a few years old.

https://yougov.com/en-gb/topics/brand/Meta-Brand

Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

#404

Post by gorgoiler »

jmathai wrote: post #340

> Your personal data is safe and secure That's from the article. I can't think of anyone I'd trust less with my data than Meta. Well, thieves, I guess.

Do you mean in terms of competence at resisting breaches? I trust Meta’s security team a lot more than anyone else’s in that respect.

They are big enough and pay well to have a competent team. Compared with momandpop.com (willing but too small) or equifax (big but unwilling) and given the kind of data they are guarding, they’re probably the best in the business.

Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

#405

Post by tyre »

qingcharles wrote: post #353
anabis wrote: post #257

First thing I am using this is for scraping (my) groups from FaceBook since they shutdown the API a while back. "Give me comments from this group from 1/1 to 8/1 in json". Hope it works.

I'll be interested to see what access it gives you to Meta products. Grok Bot doesn't have direct access to Twitter like Grok on x.com does, for no good reason, but it does have an API plugin which gives you free $20 credit if you install it. When these companies want to lock you into their platforms it seems kinda dumb to not give their own products access to their own products.

The walled garden is basically their entire moat. If you have access to that, you can do things like, "Every hour, write all updates in chronological order to a file $HERE", then you have an API feed. You integrate that into your own homespun app, then you never see their ads. They hate that.

All of Meta's products have to be user-hostile, because the first thing you want is interop and that kills their monetization.

Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

#406

Post by threecheese »

qingcharles wrote: post #348
porridgeraisin wrote: post #152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It was behind the heavy 100$/mo+ plans. Clearly meant for enterprise and not consumer.

Only for about a week. Then they saw sense and started rolling it out to the peasants too. I use it every day now, having it look a few times a day for glitched pricing deals and hunting down useful directories to list my projects in.

Stealing and spamming? Sounds right :) jk

Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

#407

Post by SoftTalker »

paultreanor wrote: post #387

It's still very obvious that they have come up with genuine killer usecases for agents for normal life admin. Like this is the best they can do? "Tickets just opened for the movie you're tracking. 4:30 PM or 7:30 PM. Interesting?"

At least it wasn't booking a flight or restaurant reservation.

Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

#408

Post by Barbing »

randycupertino wrote: post #248
abixb wrote: post #234

I think Meta's strategy is to capture the 'normie-tier' of AI users. I know most of us here on HN track model releases quite frequently and discuss every parameter weight out of them, but most of the world is just... oblivious? I was discussing latest in tech with an accounting friend out of curiosity, and I kept talking about tiers of GPT-5.6 (Sol vs Terra vs Luna) and asked which one she used on the desktop 'Work'…

I think of my mom who doesn't care and doesn't understand the difference between google AI Overview vs actual google search results. "I looked it up" - she doesn't care what tool she is using she just wants answers to how long bake pork or the best throw pillows to buy or whatever else she is looking up. She's mostly using google AI tools because it's easy and free and on her landing page.

“Is that just what AI says?”

‘No, it’s from $majorAmericanCorporation.’ look at screen, see $majorAmericanCorporation name in a pill as citation you can click on within the Google AI Overview

Thanks Google!

Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

#409

Post by rconti »

abixb wrote: post #234

I think Meta's strategy is to capture the 'normie-tier' of AI users. I know most of us here on HN track model releases quite frequently and discuss every parameter weight out of them, but most of the world is just... oblivious? I was discussing latest in tech with an accounting friend out of curiosity, and I kept talking about tiers of GPT-5.6 (Sol vs Terra vs Luna) and asked which one she used on the desktop 'Work'…

I use claude all day every day, and sometimes codex, and I still don't change models. I guess I'm more interested in accomplishing the thing than in experimenting with a dozen ways of accomplishing the same thing.

Re: Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent

#410

Post by SoftTalker »

AM1010101 wrote: post #171

This is a pretty good move for Meta to go all in on. AI is ChatGPT and Gemini to normies, Meta is not considered. However when I ask one of my less technical friends if they connected any tools (email, calendar, docs, etc) they are clueless that this is even possible. To them AI answers questions and generates images. If Meta can get this to the masses as the first AI thats useful at doing agentic things, ie an assis…

I think the average user doesn't have enough going on to need that, or they will be unable to articulate what it is they want the agent to do.
Post reply on HN