Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Jellyfin 12.0

jellyfin.org

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

311–320 of 357 posts

Re: Jellyfin 12.0

#311

Post by bigstrat2003 »

drnick1 wrote: post #252
joshstrange wrote: post #175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’ve set up literally hundreds of different self-hosted applications over the years on my homelab. I’ve configured the reverse proxy by hand, setup the docker containers, etc. Now I can just tell Claude “Setup XYZ app on my server” and it does it all and leaves a note in my Obsidian vault documenting the service (setup instructions, backups, hostname, etc). Trying out new things has never been easier now that the eff…

I would caution against this approach. It's fine to have Claude write a setup script, or whatever you need, but don't run coding agents as your main user on your production machine with full access to your files or whatever your "homelab" consists of.

Yep. You should never let an LLM have access to the system. It's irresponsible as all get out.

Re: Jellyfin 12.0

#312

Post by bhaney »

alashow wrote: post #262

Interesting nobody mentioned Silo yet. https://siloserver.org/

It's vibe-slop that popped up just a couple months ago. Aside from inappropriate advertising, why would anyone mention it under a Jellyfin release announcement?

Re: Jellyfin 12.0

#313

Post by erulabs »

entropicdrifter wrote: post #288
erulabs wrote: post #278

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Capitalistic" is, I'm sure, meant derogatorily. I disagree with the sentiment, and I think the Jellyfin maintainers deserve at least a living wage for their time and efforts.

The Jellyfin devs have chosen for it to be a community/hobby project in order to avoid perverse incentives. That's a completely valid choice. There's a reason JF is the only mainstream media server solution that's continuously improved without any signs of enshittification, and personally I'm inclined to agree with the devs that keeping it completely non-profit has been a boon to its ongoing health and popularity.

Agreed! To clarify: I think they deserve a wage for their work and have previously donated, and that 'capitalizing' on their work is more than justifiable. I also think it's fine that they don't care!

Re: Jellyfin 12.0

#314

Post by bigstrat2003 »

distantsounds wrote: post #305
dev0p wrote: post #208

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What features is it missing, exactly?

oh, i don't know, an easy means of sharing your library with friends, one of the best features of plex?

What's wrong with making a friend an account on your server so they can log in? I've done it, it works fine.

Re: Jellyfin 12.0

#315

Post by port11 »

danvayn wrote: post #271
port11 wrote: post #264

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or, you know, invest the money and try to become more self-sufficient over time, safeguarding development in the future.

Classic HN user take. While $600 is obviously a pisspoor budget, they do incredible work compared to closed source solution companies like Plex. Not everything needs to be capitalistic, in fact the product pretty much sells and safeguards itself based on being freeware with pretty quality UX. Who will replace them?

I don’t disagree with you and I’ve just learned they specifically avoid monetisation to keep their incentives aligned with the community’s. Thanks everyone for pointing that out.

(…but you couldn’t call me capitalistic, that really doesn’t suit me.)

I just hope they can continue to develop the product, because I’m using it daily and don’t want it to go away.

Re: Jellyfin 12.0

#316

Post by unshavedyak »

zchrykng wrote: post #303
unshavedyak wrote: post #253

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've got a Caddy instance setup which proxies my traffic and has dead easy integration for domain DNS registration. Super handy

Caddy is great, but doesn't solve the problem I was talking about on its own. Caddy will get SSL certs automatically if it is exposed to the internet and DNS for that domain points to it, but if you are routing over tailscale exclusively Caddy can't automatically validate the domain names over ACME. There is a Caddy extension for doing DNS based validation, but that puts you back to needing a DNS provider with an API…

> There is a Caddy extension for doing DNS based validation, but that puts you back to needing a DNS provider with an API.

Yea, for clarity this is what i was describing. I use Porkbun's API and the Caddy instance isn't reachable from the internet, only local and over tailscale

Re: Jellyfin 12.0

#317

Post by Hard_Space »

jaffa2 wrote: post #180
Hard_Space wrote: post #128

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would be interested to hear from anyone who set it and can still access Plex over their LAN in a network outage. I have set this multiple times according to docs, and it worked only once ever, thereafter apparently resetting to online login. Of course, they do not make this an easy setting to change!

You need plex pass to do this now. They changed it recently you didnt used to need it.

I have had lifetime pass about ten years.

Re: Jellyfin 12.0

#318

Post by Draiken »

SamuelAdams wrote: post #308
lordfrikk wrote: post #291

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've been using Jellyfin for roughly 5 years, most of my library are Blu-ray remuxes (50-100 GB) and I haven't had a single one fail to play. My setup is Apple TV with Infuse connected to a LG C9 with a modern Yamaha receiver. Transcoding is a whole can of worms I chose to avoid by playing everything directly.

I currently use the plex direct play feature on android tv with a Nvidia Shield Pro. Is there an equivalent jellyfin android tv app?

Yes there's an android TV app. It's not the greatest feature-wise but never had any issues

Re: Jellyfin 12.0

#319

Post by vulkoingim »

s_dev wrote: post #300
vulkoingim wrote: post #269

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Looks good...but having to join Discord to try it is one step too many, if I have to be honest.

It's still in beta unfortunately but this is Hacker News and it's okay to share software before it hits prod. People want to be ahead of the curve and it looks promising.

Absolutely, I never said it's not :) I'm just not a fan of the Discord distribution channel - but the reply above you said it's on AppleTV, and I might try that!

Re: Jellyfin 12.0

#320

Post by vulkoingim »

jasona123 wrote: post #309
vulkoingim wrote: post #269

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Looks good...but having to join Discord to try it is one step too many, if I have to be honest.

FYI: it is GA for Apple TV (so no Discord required) - it’s only iOS/iPad that’s still in public beta. (Source: was in the Neptune tvOS beta, still am for iOS - it is a fun squad though)

Thanks for the heads up, I'll give it a try on the tv!
Post reply on HN