Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It just seems absurd to me. But this is just the "consciousness is based on information, not substrate" position, right? It seems absurd? I understand that it troubles you that real computation can be done with marbles... but... it can. So you must believe that consciousness is entirely uncomputable? Do you have any other examples of physical processes that are beyond computation? > A priori why must real concepts…
> So you must believe that consciousness is entirely uncomputable? Do you have any other examples of physical processes that are beyond computation? I think all physical processes are distinct from their descriptions, and have a real existence. We can describe some things about them but our descriptions are not equal to them.
I just wanted to thank you - our talk helped me develop my ideas around "emotion faking" - which I was having trouble articulating.
Thank you.