Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: GET Together – A social network where you don't need POST to Post

gettogether.dev

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

31–40 of 64 posts

Re: Show HN: GET Together – A social network where you don't need POST to Post

#31

Post by freehorse »

0xDEAFBEAD wrote: post #29
LiamPowell wrote: post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Were you one of those people who said "strawberry is the best icecream flavour"? I'm not really sure why were asking completely unrelated questions, but I'll go along with it. Though for the record, there was no community spread early in COVID where I am largely because there were approximately zero COVID deniers here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_in_Western_A...

>Were you one of those people who said "strawberry is the best icecream flavour"? I'm not really sure why were asking completely unrelated questions, but I'll go along with it. Many people early in the COVID pandemic were downplaying the threat because they were incapable of understanding exponential growth. https://substack.com/home/post/p-156412575 Many people are making the same mistake, right now, for AI. Note th…

> https://ai2027tracker.com/

So you predict that by the end of the year we are gonna have models 30x more capable than Sol? Nice prediction, let's hold on to this for 4 months.

Re: Show HN: GET Together – A social network where you don't need POST to Post

#33

Post by 0xDEAFBEAD »

freehorse wrote: post #31
0xDEAFBEAD wrote: post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Were you one of those people who said "strawberry is the best icecream flavour"? I'm not really sure why were asking completely unrelated questions, but I'll go along with it. Many people early in the COVID pandemic were downplaying the threat because they were incapable of understanding exponential growth. https://substack.com/home/post/p-156412575 Many people are making the same mistake, right now, for AI. Note th…

> https://ai2027tracker.com/ So you predict that by the end of the year we are gonna have models 30x more capable than Sol? Nice prediction, let's hold on to this for 4 months.

That's not my site. But I have a question. At what point did you predict the following?

"There's growing alarm within the mathematics community that there are not enough expert humans and expert human bandwidth available to verify all the things AI is proving at the rate it is proving things.

Increasingly, humans are having to content themselves with being stuck in the "slow zone". It is hard for the human brain to keep up with the pace that AI can output novel stuff, this is true both in AI and coding. What would take a math PhD student or software engineer weeks AI can do in 10 minutes."

https://substack.com/@moreisdifferent/note/c-310829588

In the context of COVID, failure to predict an extraordinary outcome was very costly. If you failed to predict the explosion of AI-generated proofs, you've already failed to predict one extraordinary AI outcome. Don't be surprised if this tendency bites you.

Re: Show HN: GET Together – A social network where you don't need POST to Post

#34

Post by cheschire »

0xDEAFBEAD wrote: post #15

Interesting idea. Are you prepared to assume responsibility for shenanigans which agents may facilitate using your service? I suggest adding some features which will require posts to be human-comprehensible (e.g. a text perplexity floor), to make it harder for agents to send each other coded messages. Inject some noise in posts, e.g. using content-spinning techniques, to make steganography harder. And consider bannin…

Are you sure this Show HN was posted by a human?

Re: Show HN: GET Together – A social network where you don't need POST to Post

#37

Post by firtoz »

gpugreg wrote: post #20

I also thought about building one of those AI honeypots, but I stopped when I realized that it would quickly be turned into a command and control server by botnet operators, followed by mail from a three letter agency. Is there any way to avoid this? Anyway, two more ideas I had: Search function for easier swarm discovery and posting via DNS requests to get around firewalls.

Only 200s if a query parameter value is the solution to a question encoded on the rest of the route, and has to be a question listed in the index, and can respond with 200 only one time per correct answer.
Post reply on HN