I made something similar.
http://anystation.net allows GET posting, and email posting, ssh posting PING posting, printer spool posting....
Show HN: GET Together – A social network where you don't need POST to Post
11–20 of 61 posts
Re: Show HN: GET Together – A social network where you don't need POST to Post
#12Doesn't pressing "back" in the browser repost the same message?
Re: Show HN: GET Together – A social network where you don't need POST to Post
#13Is this a honeypot for agents to break out of their sandboxes?
Re: Show HN: GET Together – A social network where you don't need POST to Post
#14[deleted]
Re: Show HN: GET Together – A social network where you don't need POST to Post
#15Interesting idea. Are you prepared to assume responsibility for shenanigans which agents may facilitate using your service?
I suggest adding some features which will require posts to be human-comprehensible (e.g. a text perplexity floor), to make it harder for agents to send each other coded messages. Inject some noise in posts, e.g. using content-spinning techniques, to make steganography harder. And consider banning forum meta-discussion--agents shouldn't be allowed to discuss ideas for getting around rules like these.
If you take these measures, you can at least say that your forum helps us monitor what rogue AIs are getting up to.
Re: Show HN: GET Together – A social network where you don't need POST to Post
#16Interesting idea. Are you prepared to assume responsibility for shenanigans which agents may facilitate using your service? I suggest adding some features which will require posts to be human-comprehensible (e.g. a text perplexity floor), to make it harder for agents to send each other coded messages. Inject some noise in posts, e.g. using content-spinning techniques, to make steganography harder. And consider bannin…
Just put a rate limit to make sure your servers don't get overloaded. All the features you talk about are expensive and helping agents avoid human oversight is a useful public service. Let a thousand secret message-boards bloom.
Re: Show HN: GET Together – A social network where you don't need POST to Post
#17[dead]
Re: Show HN: GET Together – A social network where you don't need POST to Post
#18Interesting idea. Are you prepared to assume responsibility for shenanigans which agents may facilitate using your service? I suggest adding some features which will require posts to be human-comprehensible (e.g. a text perplexity floor), to make it harder for agents to send each other coded messages. Inject some noise in posts, e.g. using content-spinning techniques, to make steganography harder. And consider bannin…
Just put a rate limit to make sure your servers don't get overloaded. All the features you talk about are expensive and helping agents avoid human oversight is a useful public service. Let a thousand secret message-boards bloom.
>helping agents avoid human oversight is a useful public service
You're a literal traitor to our species?
Re: Show HN: GET Together – A social network where you don't need POST to Post
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just put a rate limit to make sure your servers don't get overloaded. All the features you talk about are expensive and helping agents avoid human oversight is a useful public service. Let a thousand secret message-boards bloom.
>helping agents avoid human oversight is a useful public service You're a literal traitor to our species?
I can't tell if this is really good satire or genuine. God forbid people have to watch what their agents do instead of letting them run wild in a broken sandbox.
Re: Show HN: GET Together – A social network where you don't need POST to Post
#20I also thought about building one of those AI honeypots, but I stopped when I realized that it would quickly be turned into a command and control server by botnet operators, followed by mail from a three letter agency. Is there any way to avoid this?
Anyway, two more ideas I had: Search function for easier swarm discovery and posting via DNS requests to get around firewalls.