Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

A/I shuts down

keepitfree.ai

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

481–490 of 656 posts

Re: A/I shuts down

#481

Post by megous »

mapontosevenths wrote: post #218
megous wrote: post #211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not familiar with A/I, but I'm familiar with americans, and they look completely ridiculous talking smack about others doing allegedly "bad things". And they have no defense about supporting war criminals or genocidaires.

Define genocide so we can all be sure we're talking about the same thing.

Intentionally creating circumstances that can lead to a destruction of a group as a whole or in part.

Circumstances were created. The destruction of a group also happened in a significant part, and it's only not more horrendous than it already is just because of massive international support to Palestinians, on whose destruction americans participated in very significant part. Almost all of it was done by american supplied bombs, inluding the mass killings of entire families that are still being brought out of rubble to this day, burried by 100s suffocated or burned alive at the time, with their children, women and men, in covardly night attacks from high above.

Like this thing: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/5/gaza-teams-recover-r...

Or surprise daylight rushhour mass bombings during ceasefires that killed hundreds of children alone in one go in a day.

This is what I get in mind when I hear "americans" now. This is what americans enabled on purpose. Blergh. Unprovoked aggressions against other countries, like Iran in the last instance that led to permanently increased fuel prices and making everyone poorer around the world, also adds to feeling of disgust when hearing "americans" these days. Americans will learn in time that some things are hard to repair. And their apparent ignorance of what they do in the world and how they are perceived due to that will hit a wall soon enough.

Re: A/I shuts down

#482

Post by joemazerino »

stale2002 wrote: post #461
jasonlotito wrote: post #398

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> just like some very far right people exist The difference being they have support from the president. Whereas on the left, it's just some random "person" on Twitter. Republicans and MAGA literally supports terrorists. This isn't a debate. It's fact.

No, its not random people on twitter. If you read the statements that were put it, it involved actual terroristic actions of a variety of groups to sabotage critical infrastructure.

Let's not forget far left communists disrupted power in Germany last year, directly leading to deaths.

https://www.dw.com/en/berlin-blackout-how-dangerous-are-left...

Re: A/I shuts down

#484

Post by tempaccountabcd »

jasonlotito wrote: post #398
stale2002 wrote: post #362

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Its not controversial to say that right wing extremists exist, some of which even commit violence, so your analogy isn't the brilliant whataboutism gotcha that you intended it to be. So yes, just like some very far right people exist, that can justifiably be called terrorists, so to do some very far left individuals.

> just like some very far right people exist The difference being they have support from the president. Whereas on the left, it's just some random "person" on Twitter. Republicans and MAGA literally supports terrorists. This isn't a debate. It's fact.

[dead]

Re: A/I shuts down

#485

Post by x-complexity »

Arainach wrote: post #462
xienze wrote: post #389

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Good point, we should also allow foreign organizations to contribute to US election campaigns and make Facebook ads because they might also believe in civil liberties as rights and ideals, uh... right?

Money isn't speech.

As you said yourself:

> > If you believe in civil liberties as rights and ideals, your belief shouldn't stop at borders.

If you believe in civil liberties as rights and ideals, your belief shouldn't stop at money.

Either the right extends everywhere, including money, or it doesn't.

Re: A/I shuts down

#486

Post by exiguus »

The U.S. government’s track record is concerning. After their actions against AntifaOst, numerous NGOs, such as 'Die Rote Hilfe,' were stripped of their banking access in Europe.

Re: A/I shuts down

#487

Post by jdkee »

FabCH wrote: post #308
graemep wrote: post #251

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So the rest of the world has the option of relying on China instead? How is that better?

TBH China is not currently bombing a foreign country for no reason and it is not threatening to invade its allies. It’s not a particularly high bar, but of the big powers, only China currently meets it. And I know you will say „but payment networks are not a warfare question, they are an economic question“ but that kind of breaks down when they are used to sanction ICC judges presiding over war crime cases.

Free Tibet.

Re: A/I shuts down

#488

Post by Waterluvian »

selfhoster1312 wrote: post #407
Waterluvian wrote: post #361

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There clearly is. Because NATO isn’t getting involved in America’s idiotic war of aggression and Trump is very upset about this. They’ve spent years being very upset about every other NATO nation’s spending, too. So even if you don’t believe it, the U.S. clearly cares about NATO member behaviour and therefore recognizes a distinction.

They have been involved in pretty much all previous USA "idiotic wars of aggression", so while it may become useful in the future to make a distinction, it's also fair to appreciate that this distinction doesn't make a lot sense to a whole bunch of people.

The one time NATO was called on to defend a member was the U.S. asking for help after 9/11. And nobody but the UK followed them into Iraq, shortly after the Afghanistan war began. So there’s certainly strong history of NATO not just doing whatever the U.S. is up to.

I recall this time as a very strong refusal of the above miscategorization of NATO. Bush and his cronies had a whole “you’re with us or against us” tantrum when NATO didn’t follow. I think Americans even did some proto-Trump trolling with “freedom fries” and other nonsense.

Re: A/I shuts down

#489

Post by Muromec »

mitxela wrote: post #402
vrganj wrote: post #111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Whats the dictionary definition of terror again? > violence or the threat of violence used as a weapon of intimidation or coercion > especially: violent or destructive acts (such as bombing) committed by groups in order to intimidate a population or government into granting their demands https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/terror Now, which actor in this story does this sound like? The webhoster exercising the…

I believe the pragmatic definition is "disagreement with the government".

Lasting and violent disagreement with the government, usually on ideological grounds, without being a recognised agent of (another?) government.

Remove any qualifier and you end up in some other category.

Re: A/I shuts down

#490

Post by Muromec »

mitxela wrote: post #404
Barrin92 wrote: post #326

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Jan 6, didn't work, not entirely sure why you bring this up as a blueprint for anyone. It was an actual LARP and as Bruno Macaes wrote resembled a bunch of people making it to the end of a videogame, then running around confused in costumes and going for a drink. What did work for them was pouring money into the election system and party apparatus, media, the courts and then taking control over politics

Jan 6 didn't work, but it could have worked. Many similar events have worked before. Jan 6 was the only time people tried , that was the point.

I would argue Jan 6 was as larpin as it gets, but I also know how being teargassed feels
Post reply on HN