Live data from Hacker News

GrapheneOS says Pixel 11 has MTE support after all

grapheneos.social

171–177 of 177 posts

Re: GrapheneOS says Pixel 11 has MTE support after all

#171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Tbf with all the information that has come to light since then Rossmann and FUTO were also not behaving correctly and it was fair from him to deny coming onto their show (where they have also invited fascists before)

[flagged]

Re: GrapheneOS says Pixel 11 has MTE support after all

#172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Nobody is interested in reinstalling OS-es on their phones because the amount of effort to create an Android ISO that's as usable as what's preinstalled is truly gigantic. You've restated my thesis. > Yes, I am on the younger side I could tell.

It's pretty clear that you have an extremely limited exposure to the custom Android development space, since you never rebutted any of the points I brought up. Custom android was never easy and never will be. And it's fundamentally incompatible with the concept of having a truly secure env on your device (same as in the PC space, ironically enough).

Son, I've been building and installing custom roms since the HTC Dream, was involved in OpenMoko, and have owned nearly every open or Linux-running phone of the last 30 years back to the Sharp Zaurus and iPaqs.

Your custom rom experience sits wholly within a larger category of computer systems experience about which I've been speaking.

The sort of fragmentation you describe is a symptom, not a foregone conclusion.

Re: GrapheneOS says Pixel 11 has MTE support after all

#173
post #113
post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Actually functionality, stability of apps and features people use.

What functionality and features are lost in the base Pixel OS (not apps) as a direct result of GrapheneOS's changes to AOSP?

There's quite a list you can get even from GrapheneOS's posts - among other things, there's a rather large set of apps that will outright crash when MTE is enabled.

Re: GrapheneOS says Pixel 11 has MTE support after all

#174
post #113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What functionality and features are lost in the base Pixel OS (not apps) as a direct result of GrapheneOS's changes to AOSP?

Very little if anything at all. Depends a bit how you draw the line between an app and the base OS. Contactless payments dont work with Google Pay - but that is due to Google using attestatiom to check if the OS is GMS lincesed (GrapheneOS is not). There are alternative contactless payment options that work fine.

Moving the goalposts to "it's not their fault that it doesn't work" doesn't really change it doesn't work.

Re: GrapheneOS says Pixel 11 has MTE support after all

#175
post #173
post #113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What functionality and features are lost in the base Pixel OS (not apps) as a direct result of GrapheneOS's changes to AOSP?

There's quite a list you can get even from GrapheneOS's posts - among other things, there's a rather large set of apps that will outright crash when MTE is enabled.

Could you list a couple of the biggest functionality losses from AOSP due to GrapheneOS changes? I might be misunderstanding what you mean.

Re: GrapheneOS says Pixel 11 has MTE support after all

#176

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Nobody is interested in reinstalling OS-es on their phones because the amount of effort to create an Android ISO that's as usable as what's preinstalled is truly gigantic. You've restated my thesis. > Yes, I am on the younger side I could tell.

It's pretty clear that you have an extremely limited exposure to the custom Android development space, since you never rebutted any of the points I brought up. Custom android was never easy and never will be. And it's fundamentally incompatible with the concept of having a truly secure env on your device (same as in the PC space, ironically enough).

> Custom android was never easy and never will be.

It's easy when it comes preinstalled.

> And it's fundamentally incompatible with the concept of having a truly secure env on your device (same as in the PC space, ironically enough).

Where on earth do you get this misconception? Custom Android != has root. If you don't think Graphene is reasonably secure, explain how?

Re: GrapheneOS says Pixel 11 has MTE support after all

#177

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> 99% of people never installed an OS and never will, what's your point here? That the 1% who do build visicalc, Linux, the internet, Google, and every application and innovation that happens outside the corporate wall. The entire ecosystem everyone else ends up using. And that calling that niche is ridiculous, shortsighted, and shooting oneself as a platform owner in the foot.

What are you talking about? You're making zero sense. I've been in the niche of modifying and installing my own ROMs, then to kernels, and now doing the same things commercially. It is a niche, it always was. There was never a mass community of users, the most installs you used to see on any given AOSP based project is maybe 20-30K for the most popular devices like Redmis, Pocos or Google Nexus phones. It's still a n…

GrapheneOS has ~500000+ users and climbing. It is getting rapid mainstream awareness and appeal and is partnered with a top 10 OEM.
Post reply on HN