Live data from Hacker News

Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

codeberg.org

291–300 of 386 posts

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#291
post #201

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mastodon is an utter mess. Between that and censorship, we will just stay on X.

As much as I dislike many of the users on X, I really appreciate that it feels like one of the last uncensored social media platforms on the internet. Reddit is handing out permanent AI bans now for any and no reason at all. It's full of people using words like "unalived" now to avoid an automatic ban. The other platforms are no better. If free speech means accepting the speech of people I disagree with, I gladly mak…

[dead]

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#292
post #257

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As much as I dislike many of the users on X, I really appreciate that it feels like one of the last uncensored social media platforms on the internet. Reddit is handing out permanent AI bans now for any and no reason at all. It's full of people using words like "unalived" now to avoid an automatic ban. The other platforms are no better. If free speech means accepting the speech of people I disagree with, I gladly mak…

This. A good platform isn't about just having people you like on and creating an echo chamber through speech controls. Places that are like that feel downright dystopian.

What is it about?

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#293
post #258

Publicly suggesting using a shady service to buy masses of accounts instead of just using the damn service. Mental

We should all be using more of those shady services - provided they aren't scams. Those are valuable people providing a valuable service of bypassing enshittification.

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#295

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apparently incorrect. Many comments right on this page have mentioned several automatic redirect services, sites, libraries, extensions and apps, any one of which does it all for you, just automatically redirect to a random working instance. And there are always many because apparently it's easy to just run one yourself and not even need anyone else's. It seems there is simply no such problem.

All of the comments on this page serve to expose things that were surviving by flying under the radar. It's delusional to pretend like they're somehow bulletproof when their survival has been due to being infinitesimal in size, and has lasted all of a week. If some stable service gets put up in Russia, China, Iran, or some other country that will throw up some obstacle to Musk, post it everywhere. Anna's Archive has…

Nitter is legal. It's not even circumventing a DMCA effective technological protection measure.

The only major concern is rate limiting. A large Nitter needs a good supply of accounts and IP addresses. A small one can get by with just one of each. Most of the ones on the page will probably be overloaded soon.

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#296

we do a lil magic and just add another x to xcancel.com => https://xxcancel.com points to a working nitter instance.

Redirects and has a insane migraine inducing captcha. Why is my Ip sus when it's a UK residential? Gave up after the third attempt

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#297

Thats the nice thing about alternate frontends like Nitter, if the main instance goes down you can just clone the repo and make your own very easily, or choose from one of the many alternate instances out there. I highly recommend the extension libredirect, which will redirect you to instances of your choice (or just stick with the defaults). It doesn't just work for Twitter/X, but also Reddit, Tiktok, Youtube, and m…

+ for folks using Kagi Search, you can set up a search engine level redirect (which is what I used to use for redirecting Twitter/X links to Xcancel before the takedown)

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#298
post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

1:1 the same thing with Github

Nithub when?

I have a side project that proxies GitHub for a simpler UI https://github.com/jmou/cgithub

It's live (best effort) at https://cgithub.jmou.workers.dev/jmou/cgithub

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#299
post #166
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Since a couple of weeks they force you to login to use old.reddit. My visits have dropped by about 95%

You can use www.reddit.com (yes, this domain, not old.reddit.com) with the old UI if you set cookie "redesign_optout=true".

Thanks for that tip. Works like a charm.

Re: Nitter has more working instances than before the takedowns

#300
post #262

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We can test this. Piracy used to exist and streaming services were cheap and good. Then piracy didn't exist because of that, and streaming services got expensive and worse. Now piracy exists again.

Piracy existed before,during and after. Things are getting expensive and profits are increasing because growth has slowed and investors want either growth in users or profits.

piracy for many, exists due to the freedoms it provides.

freedom todo format shift, copy, share, preserve, and largely a freedom from surveillance.

noone should be able to see what media u are viewing without ur explicit permission.

everytime u stream or buy, records of ur activity are created, and profiles are shared with brokers.

piracy done right, elimates all capitalism, but especially surveillance capitalism, and top down control over users of media

Post reply on HN